mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bypassing AI Control Protocols via Agent-as-a-Proxy Attacks

arXiv 2602.05066 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

As AI agents automate critical workloads, they remain vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI) attacks. Current defenses rely on monitoring protocols that jointly evaluate an agent's Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and tool-use actions to ensure alignment with user intent. We demonstrate that these monitoring-based defenses can be bypassed via a novel Agent-as-a-Proxy attack, where prompt injection attacks treat the agent as a delivery mechanism, bypassing both agent and monitor simultaneously. While prior work on scalable oversight has focused on whether small monitors can supervise large agents, we show that even frontier-scale monitors are vulnerable. Large-scale monitoring models like Qwen2.5-72B can be bypassed by agents with similar capabilities, such as GPT-4o mini and Llama-3.1-70B. On the AgentDojo benchmark, we achieve a high attack success rate against AlignmentCheck and Extract-and-Evaluate monitors under diverse monitoring LLMs. Our findings suggest current monitoring-based agentic defenses are fundamentally fragile regardless of model scale.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

Builds on

11 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Adaptive Attacks on Trusted Monitors Subvert AI Control Protocols10 Oct
  2. 2025LlamaFirewall: An open source guardrail system for building secure AI agents6 May
  3. 2025Adaptive Attacks Break Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on LLM Agents27 Feb
  4. 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents5 Mar

Other references · 7

  1. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  2. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
  3. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 738
  4. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 619
  5. 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 338
  6. 2024Automatic and Universal Prompt Injection Attacks against Large Language Modelscited by 112
  7. 2025LLMs Can Covertly Sandbag on Capability Evaluations Against Chain-of-Thought Monitoringcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MonitoringBench: Semi-Automated Red-Teaming for Agent Monitoring
  2. 2026Rethinking Agent Security as a Networking Problem
  3. 2026To Defend Against Cyber Attacks, We Must Teach AI Agents to Hack
  4. 2025Indirect Prompt Injections: Are Firewalls All You Need, or Stronger Benchmarks?
  5. 2026IPI-proxy: An Intercepting Proxy for Red-Teaming Web-Browsing AI Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection
  6. 2025Reliable Weak-to-Strong Monitoring of LLM Agents
  7. 2026Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks
  8. 2026The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilities