mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stochastic Decision Horizons for Survival-Based Constrained Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2602.04599 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose stochastic decision horizons (SDH), a theoretically grounded framework for survival-based constrained reinforcement learning from per-step violation signals. Rather than treating violations as expenditure of a cumulative budget, SDH shortens the effective decision horizon when violations occur, reducing current reward credit and future bootstrapping. We show that this construction represents a geometric-horizon survival constraint and, for a fixed Lagrange multiplier, remains the same SDH problem up to a constant reward offset that acts as an implicit incentive for survival. Using control as inference, we derive two off-policy and replay-compatible, regularized algorithms with post-violation semantics. Absorbing-state ends the decision process, so only surviving decisions pay policy KL, yielding AS-SAC. Virtual termination stops reward credit while the process continues, retaining ordinary discounted KL and yielding VT-MPO. To connect SDH with cumulative-cost CMDPs, we introduce violation-depth profiles. Under exponential-tail single-scale profiles, the SDH statistic determines cumulative cost; departures from this form mark where the connection breaks. Experiments validate both the method and this predicted scope. On the 90-muscle H2190 humanoid in Hyfydy, VT-MPO matches the EWA reference in peak gait realism, with its highest observed gait-match checkpoint at 21M environment steps versus 90M for EWA and markedly more stable training. On Safety Gymnasium, violation-depth profiles predict the regimes in which SDH achieves strong reward-violation trade-offs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Ensuring Safety in an Uncertain Environment: Constrained MDPs via Stochastic Thresholds
  2. 2026Boundary-Seeking Policy Gradient for Safe Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Proactive Constrained Policy Optimization with Preemptive Penalty
  4. 2024Safe Reinforcement Learning for Constrained Markov Decision Processes with Stochastic Stopping Time
  5. 2026Robust Peak-cost Constrained Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Random Time Horizons
  7. 2026Learning Infinite-Horizon Average-Reward CMDPs via State Augmentation
  8. 2024Improved Regret Bound for Safe Reinforcement Learning via Tighter Cost Pessimism and Reward Optimism