Unmasking Superspreaders: Data-Driven Approaches for Identifying and Comparing Key Influencers of Conspiracy Theories on X.com
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conspiracy theories can threaten society by spreading misinformation, deepening polarization, and eroding trust in democratic institutions. Social media often fuels the spread of conspiracies, primarily driven by two key actors: Superspreaders -- influential individuals disseminating conspiracy content at disproportionately high rates, and Bots -- automated accounts designed to amplify conspiracies strategically. To counter the spread of conspiracy theories, it is critical to both identify these actors and to better understand their behavior. However, a systematic analysis of these actors as well as real-world-applicable identification methods are still lacking. In this study, we leverage over seven million tweets from the COVID-19 pandemic to analyze key differences between Human Superspreaders and Bots across dimensions such as linguistic complexity, toxicity, and hashtag usage. Our analysis reveals distinct communication strategies: Superspreaders tend to use more complex language and substantive content while relying less on structural elements like hashtags and emojis, likely to enhance credibility and authority. By contrast, Bots favor simpler language and strategic cross-usage of hashtags, likely to increase accessibility, facilitate infiltration into trending discussions, and amplify reach. To counter both Human Superspreaders and Bots, we propose and evaluate 27 novel metrics for quantifying the severity of conspiracy theory spread. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of an adapted H-Index for computationally feasible identification of Human Superspreaders. By identifying behavioral patterns unique to Human Superspreaders and Bots as well as providing suitable identification methods, this study provides a foundation for mitigation strategies, including platform moderation policies, temporary and permanent account suspensions, and public awareness campaigns.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
12 of 56 references.
References · 12
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2017The spread of low-credibility content by social botscited by 73
- 2017Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterizationcited by 64
- 2018Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Mediacited by 59
- 2020Automatic Detection of Influential Actors in Disinformation Networkscited by 8
- 2021What goes on inside rumour and non-rumour tweets and their reactions: A Psycholinguistic Analysescited by 8
- 2020The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebookcited by 7
- 2022Identifying and Characterizing Behavioral Classes of Radicalization within the QAnon Conspiracy on Twittercited by 7
- 2020What Types of COVID-19 Conspiracies are Populated by Twitter Bots?cited by 6
- 2022The Virality of Hate Speech on Social Mediacited by 6
- 2020Sustained Online Amplification of COVID-19 Elites in the United Statescited by 4
- 2022Identifying and characterizing superspreaders of low-credibility content on Twittercited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.