Efficient Swap Regret Minimization in Combinatorial Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses the problem of designing efficient no-swap regret algorithms for combinatorial bandits, where the number of actions N is exponentially large in the dimensionality of the problem. In this setting, designing efficient no-swap regret translates to sublinear -- in horizon T -- swap regret with polylogarithmic dependence on N. In contrast to the weaker notion of external regret minimization - a problem which is fairly well understood in the literature - achieving no-swap regret with a polylogarithmic dependence on N has remained elusive in combinatorial bandits. Our paper resolves this challenge, by introducing a no-swap-regret learning algorithm with regret that scales polylogarithmically in N and is tight for the class of combinatorial bandits. To ground our results, we also demonstrate how to implement the proposed algorithm efficiently -- that is, with a per-iteration complexity that also scales polylogarithmically in N -- across a wide range of well-studied applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
9 of 39 references.
References · 9
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2018What Doubling Tricks Can and Can't Do for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 69
- 2014Efficient Learning in Large-Scale Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 36
- 2023Fast swap regret minimization and applications to approximate correlated equilibriacited by 30
- 2014Matroid Bandits: Fast Combinatorial Optimization with Learningcited by 29
- 2013Volumetric Spanners: an Efficient Exploration Basis for Learningcited by 23
- 2024A Lower Bound on Swap Regret in Extensive-Form Gamescited by 8
- 2016An efficient high-probability algorithm for Linear Banditscited by 2
- 2025Efficient Kernelized Learning in Polyhedral Games Beyond Full-Information: From Colonel Blotto to Congestion Gamescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.