Internal Flow Signatures for Self-Checking and Refinement in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models can generate fluent answers that are unfaithful to the provided context, while many safeguards rely on external verification or a separate judge after generation. We introduce internal flow signatures that audit decision formation from depthwise dynamics at a fixed inter-block monitoring boundary. The method stabilizes token-wise motion via bias-centered monitoring, then summarizes trajectories in compact moving readout-aligned subspaces constructed from the top token and its close competitors within each depth window. Neighboring window frames are aligned by an orthogonal transport, yielding depth-comparable transported step lengths, turning angles, and subspace drift summaries that are invariant to within-window basis choices. A lightweight GRU validator trained on these signatures performs self-checking without modifying the base model. Beyond detection, the validator localizes a culprit depth event and enables a targeted refinement: the model rolls back to the culprit token and clamps an abnormal transported step at the identified block while preserving the orthogonal residual. The resulting pipeline provides actionable localization and low-overhead self-checking from internal decision dynamics. Code is available at textttgithub.com/EavnJeong/Internal-Flow-Signatures-for-Self-Checking-and-Refinement-in-LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 42 references.
References · 28
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 906
16 more
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
- 2023Active Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 506
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
- 2022RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Modelscited by 286
- 2023A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Modelscited by 253
- 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 246
- 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 116
- 2024LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Querycited by 80
- 2024Adaptive Activation Steering: A Tuning-Free LLM Truthfulness Improvement Method for Diverse Hallucinations Categoriescited by 74
- 2023Explaining How Transformers Use Context to Build Predictionscited by 42
Built on by
Not cited yet.