mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

textbfAGTAO: Robust and Stabilized LLM Unlearning via Adversarial Gating Training with Adaptive Orthogonality

arXiv 2602.01703 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable capabilities, they unintentionally memorize sensitive data, posing critical privacy and security risks. Machine unlearning is pivotal for mitigating these risks, yet existing paradigms face a fundamental dilemma: aggressive unlearning often induces catastrophic forgetting that degrades model utility, whereas conservative strategies risk superficial forgetting, leaving models vulnerable to adversarial recovery. To address this trade-off, we propose textbfAGTAO (Adversarial Gating Training with Adaptive Orthogonality), a unified framework designed to reconcile robust erasure with utility preservation. Specifically, our approach introduces Adaptive Orthogonality (AO) to dynamically mitigate geometric gradient conflicts between forgetting and retention objectives, thereby minimizing unintended knowledge degradation. Concurrently, Adversarial Gating Training (AGT) formulates unlearning as a latent-space min-max game, employing a curriculum-based gating mechanism to simulate and counter internal recovery attempts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that textbfAGTAO achieves a superior trade-off between unlearning efficacy (KUR ≈ 0.01) and model utility (MMLU 58.30). Code is available at https://github.com/TiezMind/AGT-unlearning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Unlearning Isn't Deletion: Investigating Reversibility of Machine Unlearning in LLMs22 May
  2. 2025Rethinking LLM Unlearning Objectives: A Gradient Perspective and Go Beyond26 Feb
  3. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Unlearning Techniques for Large Language Models22 Feb
  4. 2025Towards LLM Unlearning Resilient to Relearning Attacks: A Sharpness-Aware Minimization Perspective and Beyond7 Feb
  5. 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
  6. 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
  7. 2024An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety26 Sep
  8. 2024Towards Robust and Parameter-Efficient Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs13 Aug
  9. 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
  10. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  11. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  12. 2023Learn to Unlearn for Deep Neural Networks: Minimizing Unlearning Interference with Gradient Projection7 Dec

Other references · 9

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  3. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  4. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  5. 2025Logic Jailbreak: Efficiently Unlocking LLM Safety Restrictions Through Formal Logical Expressioncited by 16
  6. 2025IAG: Input-aware Backdoor Attack on VLM-based Visual Groundingcited by 11
  7. 2025RegionMarker: A Region-Triggered Semantic Watermarking Framework for Embedding-as-a-Service Copyright Protectioncited by 4
  8. 2025Machine Unlearning Meets Adversarial Robustness via Constrained Interventions on LLMscited by 3
  9. 2025Latent Adversarial Training Improves the Representation of Refusalcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.