mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Governance at the Edge of Architecture: Regulating NeuroAI and Neuromorphic Systems

arXiv 2602.01503 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2026cs.ET cs.AI cs.ARcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current AI governance frameworks, including regulatory benchmarks for accuracy, latency, and energy efficiency, are built for static, centrally trained artificial neural networks on von Neumann hardware. NeuroAI systems, embodied in neuromorphic hardware and implemented via spiking neural networks, break these assumptions. This paper examines the limitations of current AI governance frameworks for NeuroAI, arguing that assurance and audit methods must co-evolve with these architectures, aligning traditional regulatory metrics with the physics, learning dynamics, and embodied efficiency of brain-inspired computation to enable technically grounded assurance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

Builds on

6 of 37 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021The Backpropagation Algorithm Implemented on Spiking Neuromorphic Hardwarecited by 19
  2. 2022The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence: How EU regulation will impact the global AI marketcited by 18
  3. 2024On the Limitations of Compute Thresholds as a Governance Strategycited by 17
  4. 2020Nengo and low-power AI hardware for robust, embedded neuroroboticscited by 14
  5. 2025Hardware-Enabled Mechanisms for Verifying Responsible AI Developmentcited by 7
  6. 2024Data-Centric AI Governance: Addressing the Limitations of Model-Focused Policiescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.