Phase Transitions for Feature Learning in Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
According to a popular viewpoint, neural networks learn from data by first identifying low-dimensional representations, and subsequently fitting the best model in this space. Recent works provide a formalization of this phenomenon when learning multi-index models. In this setting, we are given n i.i.d. pairs (boldsymbol xi,yi), where the covariate vectors boldsymbol xi∈ℝd are isotropic, and responses yi only depend on boldsymbol xi through a k-dimensional projection boldsymbol Theta_*^sf Tboldsymbol xi. Feature learning amounts to learning the latent space spanned by boldsymbol Theta_*. In this context, we study the gradient descent dynamics of two-layer neural networks under the proportional asymptotics n,d→∞, n/d→δ, while the dimension of the latent space k and the number of hidden neurons m are kept fixed. Earlier work establishes that feature learning via polynomial-time algorithms is possible if δ> δalg, for δalg a threshold depending on the data distribution, and is impossible (within a certain class of algorithms) below δalg. Here we derive an analogous threshold δNN for two-layer networks. Our characterization of δNN opens the way to study the dependence of learning dynamics on the network architecture and training algorithm. The threshold δNN is determined by the following scenario. Training first visits points for which the gradient of the empirical risk is large and learns the directions spanned by these gradients. Then the gradient becomes smaller and the dynamics becomes dominated by negative directions of the Hessian. The threshold δNN corresponds to a phase transition in the spectrum of the Hessian in this second phase.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learningcited by 27
- 2026Low-Dimensional and Transversely Curved Optimization Dynamics in Grokkingcited by 10
- 2026The Geometry of Multi-Task Grokking: Transverse Instability, Superposition, and Weight Decay Phase Structurecited by 8
- 2026First-Order Predictable but Pairwise Fragile: Local Task Adaptation in Trained Transformerscited by 3
- 2026Topological Exploration of High-Dimensional Empirical Risk Landscapes: general approach, and applications to phase retrievalcited by 1
- 2026Algorithmic Separation between Constant-Depth and Logarithmic-Depth Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Approximate Message Passing with Random Initialization for Phase Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026Learning Orthogonal Multi-Index Models Beyond Small Initialization: Incremental Learning, Competitive Dynamics and Symmetrycited by 0
- 2026Learning Orthogonal Multi-Index Models Beyond Small Initialization: Incremental Learning, Competitive Dynamics and Symmetry9 Sep 2026
- 2026Approximate Message Passing with Random Initialization for Phase Retrieval3 Aug 2026
- 2026Algorithmic Separation between Constant-Depth and Logarithmic-Depth Neural Networks28 Jul 2026
- 2026First-Order Predictable but Pairwise Fragile: Local Task Adaptation in Trained Transformers18 Jul 2026
- 2026There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning23 Apr 2026
- 2026The Geometry of Multi-Task Grokking: Transverse Instability, Superposition, and Weight Decay Phase Structure19 Feb 2026
- 2026Topological Exploration of High-Dimensional Empirical Risk Landscapes: general approach, and applications to phase retrieval19 Feb 2026
- 2026Low-Dimensional and Transversely Curved Optimization Dynamics in Grokking18 Feb 2026