mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Sublinear Convergence Rates for Iterative Bregman Projections

arXiv 2602.01372 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2026math.OC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Entropic regularization provides a simple way to approximate linear programs whose constraints split into two or more tractable blocks. The resulting objectives are amenable to cyclic Kullback-Leibler (KL) Bregman projections, with Sinkhorn-type algorithms for optimal transport, matrix scaling, and barycenters as canonical examples. This paper gives a general blueprint for proving O(1/k) dual convergence rate with a constant that scales only linearly in 1/γ, where γ is the entropic regularization parameter. We call such rates "robust", because this mild dependence on γ underpins favorable complexity bounds for approximating the unregularized problem via alternating KL projections. The blueprint reduces the proof to a uniform primal bound and a dual bound for a quotient norm induced by the constraint split. To make these inputs usable, we propose two helper results, which rely on the non-expansiveness of the dual iterations in this quotient dual norm. Instantiating this blueprint for graph-structured transport yields a new flow-Sinkhorn algorithm for the Wasserstein-1 distance on graphs. It achieves varepsilon-additive accuracy on the transshipment cost in O(p,diameter3/varepsilon4) arithmetic operations (up to logarithmic factors), where p is the number of edges. We also provide a machine-checked Lean formalization of the core blueprint and its graph-W1 instantiation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.

Builds on

20 of 52 references.

References · 20

  1. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  2. 2017Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iterationcited by 219
  3. 2018Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithmcited by 111
  4. 2020Faster Wasserstein Distance Estimation with the Sinkhorn Divergencecited by 73
  5. 2019An Optimal Transport approach for the Schr"odinger bridge problem and convergence of Sinkhorn algorithmcited by 38
  6. 2016Scaling Algorithms for Unbalanced Transport Problemscited by 36
  7. 2015Entropic and displacement interpolation: a computational approach using the Hilbert metriccited by 34
  8. 2019Quantum Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 33
  9. 2022Mirror Descent with Relative Smoothness in Measure Spaces, with application to Sinkhorn and EMcited by 33
  10. 2022Maximum Flow and Minimum-Cost Flow in Almost-Linear Timecited by 28
  11. 2020A gradient descent perspective on Sinkhorncited by 24
  12. 2018Better and Simpler Error Analysis of the Sinkhorn-Knopp Algorithm for Matrix Scalingcited by 14
8 more
  1. 2023Quantitative contraction rates for Sinkhorn's algorithm: beyond bounded costs and compact marginalscited by 13
  2. 2021Quantitative Uniform Stability of the Iterative Proportional Fitting Procedurecited by 11
  3. 2023Hilbert's projective metric for functions of bounded growth and exponential convergence of Sinkhorn's algorithmcited by 8
  4. 2024Sharper Exponential Convergence Rates for Sinkhorn's Algorithm in Continuous Settingscited by 8
  5. 2016Quantum Optimal Transport for Tensor Field Processingcited by 7
  6. 2023Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Sinkhorn iterates and their gradients: a coupling approachcited by 7
  7. 2013Matrix-valued Monge-Kantorovich Optimal Mass Transportcited by 4
  8. 2022Nested Dissection Meets IPMs: Planar Min-Cost Flow in Nearly-Linear Timecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.