Robust Sublinear Convergence Rates for Iterative Bregman Projections
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Entropic regularization provides a simple way to approximate linear programs whose constraints split into two or more tractable blocks. The resulting objectives are amenable to cyclic Kullback-Leibler (KL) Bregman projections, with Sinkhorn-type algorithms for optimal transport, matrix scaling, and barycenters as canonical examples. This paper gives a general blueprint for proving O(1/k) dual convergence rate with a constant that scales only linearly in 1/γ, where γ is the entropic regularization parameter. We call such rates "robust", because this mild dependence on γ underpins favorable complexity bounds for approximating the unregularized problem via alternating KL projections. The blueprint reduces the proof to a uniform primal bound and a dual bound for a quotient norm induced by the constraint split. To make these inputs usable, we propose two helper results, which rely on the non-expansiveness of the dual iterations in this quotient dual norm. Instantiating this blueprint for graph-structured transport yields a new flow-Sinkhorn algorithm for the Wasserstein-1 distance on graphs. It achieves varepsilon-additive accuracy on the transshipment cost in O(p,diameter3/varepsilon4) arithmetic operations (up to logarithmic factors), where p is the number of edges. We also provide a machine-checked Lean formalization of the core blueprint and its graph-W1 instantiation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.
Builds on
20 of 52 references.
References · 20
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2017Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iterationcited by 219
- 2018Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithmcited by 111
- 2020Faster Wasserstein Distance Estimation with the Sinkhorn Divergencecited by 73
- 2019An Optimal Transport approach for the Schr"odinger bridge problem and convergence of Sinkhorn algorithmcited by 38
- 2016Scaling Algorithms for Unbalanced Transport Problemscited by 36
- 2015Entropic and displacement interpolation: a computational approach using the Hilbert metriccited by 34
- 2019Quantum Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 33
- 2022Mirror Descent with Relative Smoothness in Measure Spaces, with application to Sinkhorn and EMcited by 33
- 2022Maximum Flow and Minimum-Cost Flow in Almost-Linear Timecited by 28
- 2020A gradient descent perspective on Sinkhorncited by 24
- 2018Better and Simpler Error Analysis of the Sinkhorn-Knopp Algorithm for Matrix Scalingcited by 14
8 more
- 2023Quantitative contraction rates for Sinkhorn's algorithm: beyond bounded costs and compact marginalscited by 13
- 2021Quantitative Uniform Stability of the Iterative Proportional Fitting Procedurecited by 11
- 2023Hilbert's projective metric for functions of bounded growth and exponential convergence of Sinkhorn's algorithmcited by 8
- 2024Sharper Exponential Convergence Rates for Sinkhorn's Algorithm in Continuous Settingscited by 8
- 2016Quantum Optimal Transport for Tensor Field Processingcited by 7
- 2023Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Sinkhorn iterates and their gradients: a coupling approachcited by 7
- 2013Matrix-valued Monge-Kantorovich Optimal Mass Transportcited by 4
- 2022Nested Dissection Meets IPMs: Planar Min-Cost Flow in Nearly-Linear Timecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Unfolding with a Wasserstein Losscited by 0
- 2026Unfolding with a Wasserstein Loss21 Mar 2026