mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HYPE-EDIT-1: Benchmark for Measuring Reliability in Frontier Image Editing Models

arXiv 2602.00105 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Public demos of image editing models are typically best-case samples; real workflows pay for retries and review time. We introduce HYPE-EDIT-1, a 100-task benchmark of reference-based marketing/design edits with binary pass/fail judging. For each task we generate 10 independent outputs to estimate per-attempt pass rate, pass@10, expected attempts under a retry cap, and an effective cost per successful edit that combines model price with human review time. We release 50 public tasks and maintain a 50-task held-out private split for server-side evaluation, plus a standardized JSON schema and tooling for VLM and human-based judging. Across the evaluated models, per-attempt pass rates span 34-83 percent and effective cost per success spans USD 0.66-1.42. Models that have low per-image pricing are more expensive when you consider the total effective cost of retries and human reviews.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2026.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  3. 2022InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructionscited by 2,591
  4. 2021SDEdit: Guided Image Synthesis and Editing with Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 1,903
  5. 2022Imagic: Text-Based Real Image Editing with Diffusion Modelscited by 1,172
  6. 2022Null-text Inversion for Editing Real Images using Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 1,168
  7. 2025SpotEdit: Evaluating Visually-Guided Image Editing Methodscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Human-Aligned MLLM Judges for Fine-Grained Image Editing Evaluation: A Benchmark, Framework, and Analysis
  2. 2026Evaluating Image Editing with LLMs: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Intermediate-Layer Probing Approach
  3. 2026UniEditBench: A Unified and Cost-Effective Benchmark for Image and Video Editing via Distilled MLLMs
  4. 2025I2I-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Image-to-Image Editing Models
  5. 2023EditVal: Benchmarking Diffusion Based Text-Guided Image Editing Methods
  6. 2026MIEScore: Human-Aligned Evaluation for Multi-Source Image Editing
  7. 2025ADIEE: Automatic Dataset Creation and Scorer for Instruction-Guided Image Editing Evaluation
  8. 2024EditBoard: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Text-Based Video Editing Models