WiFiPenTester: Advancing Wireless Ethical Hacking with Governed GenAI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Wireless ethical hacking relies heavily on skilled practitioners manually interpreting reconnaissance results and executing complex, time-sensitive sequences of commands to identify vulnerable targets, capture authentication handshakes, and assess password resilience; a process that is inherently labour-intensive, difficult to scale, and prone to subjective judgement and human error. To help address these limitations, we propose WiFiPenTester, an experimental, governed, and reproducible system for GenAI-enabled wireless ethical hacking. The system integrates large language models into the reconnaissance and decision-support phases of wireless security assessment, enabling intelligent target ranking, attack feasibility estimation, and strategy recommendation, while preserving strict human-in-the-loop control and budget-aware execution. We describe the system architecture, threat model, governance mechanisms, and prompt-engineering methodology, and empirical experiments conducted across multiple wireless environments. The results demonstrate that GenAI assistance improves target selection accuracy and overall assessment efficiency, while maintaining auditability and ethical safeguards. This indicates that WiFiPenTester is a meaningful step toward practical, safe, and scalable GenAI-assisted wireless penetration testing, while reinforcing the necessity of bounded autonomy, human oversight, and rigorous governance mechanisms when deploying GenAI in ethical hacking.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.
Builds on
15 of 38 references.
References · 15
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,856
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,072
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,376
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,181
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,064
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,229
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,637
- 2023Getting pwn'd by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2022Conversing with Copilot: Exploring Prompt Engineering for Solving CS1 Problems Using Natural Languagecited by 82
- 2022Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language Modelscited by 70
- 2024A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Cyber Defences: Opportunities and Directionscited by 33
- 2025Bypassing LLM Guardrails: An Empirical Analysis of Evasion Attacks against Prompt Injection and Jailbreak Detection Systemscited by 26
Built on by
Not cited yet.