mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Cognitive Inertia in Large Reasoning Models via Latent Spike Steering

arXiv 2601.22484 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable performance by scaling test-time compute, they frequently suffer from Cognitive Inertia, a failure pattern manifesting as either overthinking (inertia of motion) or reasoning rigidity (inertia of direction). Existing detection methods, typically relying on superficial textual heuristics like self-correction tokens, often fail to capture the model's unvoiced internal conflicts. To address this, we propose STARS (Spike-Triggered Adaptive Reasoning Steering), a training-free framework designed to rectify cognitive inertia by monitoring latent dynamics. STARS identifies Cognitive Pivots-critical moments of reasoning transition-by detecting distinct L2 distance spikes in the hidden states. Upon detection, the framework employs geometric trajectory analysis to diagnose the structural nature of the transition and injects state-aware language cues to steer the model in real-time. Our experiments across diverse benchmarks confirm that STARS efficiently curtails redundant loops while improving accuracy through the adaptive correction of erroneous trajectories. STARS offers a robust, unsupervised mechanism to optimize the reasoning process of LRMs without requiring additional fine-tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

15 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Wait, We Don't Need to "Wait"! Removing Thinking Tokens Improves Reasoning Efficiency10 Jun
  2. 2025Does Thinking More always Help? Mirage of Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning Models4 Jun
  3. 2025ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning8 May
  4. 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models22 Apr
  5. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  6. 2024Token-Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning24 Dec
  7. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet3 Oct

Other references · 8

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  2. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  3. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  4. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  5. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
  6. 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Taskscited by 243
  7. 2025MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbationscited by 88
  8. 2025Reasoning Model is Stubborn: Diagnosing Instruction Overriding in Reasoning Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Understanding and Steering the Cognitive Behaviors of Reasoning Models at Test-Time
  2. 2026Internalizing LLM Reasoning via Discovery and Replay of Latent Actions
  3. 2026Reliable Control-Point Selection for Steering Reasoning in Large Language Models
  4. 2025Modeling Hierarchical Thinking in Large Reasoning Models
  5. 2026Latent Reward Steering: An Adaptive Inference-Time Framework that Implicitly Promotes Cognitive Behaviors in Reasoning LLMs
  6. 2026RISER: Orchestrating Latent Reasoning Skills for Adaptive Activation Steering
  7. 2026Predicting Future Behaviors in Reasoning Models Enables Better Steering
  8. 2026Can We Break LLMs Out of Self-Loops? Fine-Grained Reasoning Control with Activation Steering