Gauge-invariant representation holonomy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep networks learn internal representations whose geometry--how features bend, rotate, and evolve--affects both generalization and robustness. Existing similarity measures such as CKA or SVCCA capture pointwise overlap between activation sets, but miss how representations change along input paths. Two models may appear nearly identical under these metrics yet respond very differently to perturbations or adversarial stress. We introduce representation holonomy, a gauge-invariant statistic that measures this path dependence. Conceptually, holonomy quantifies the "twist" accumulated when features are parallel-transported around a small loop in input space: flat representations yield zero holonomy, while nonzero values reveal hidden curvature. Our estimator fixes gauge through global whitening, aligns neighborhoods using shared subspaces and rotation-only Procrustes, and embeds the result back to the full feature space. We prove invariance to orthogonal (and affine, post-whitening) transformations, establish a linear null for affine layers, and show that holonomy vanishes at small radii. Empirically, holonomy increases with loop radius, separates models that appear similar under CKA, and correlates with adversarial and corruption robustness. It also tracks training dynamics as features form and stabilize. Together, these results position representation holonomy as a practical and scalable diagnostic for probing the geometric structure of learned representations beyond pointwise similarity.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
10 of 18 references.
References · 10
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 318
- 2019Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Networks and the Icosahedral CNNcited by 262
- 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 240
- 2016A Riemannian Network for SPD Matrix Learningcited by 162
- 2015Optimal whitening and decorrelationcited by 93
- 2022The Lie Derivative for Measuring Learned Equivariancecited by 51
- 2018Parallel Transport Convolution: A New Tool for Convolutional Neural Networks on Manifoldscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026A Gauge Theory of Superposition: Toward a Sheaf-Theoretic Atlas of Neural Representationscited by 3
- 2026A Fiber Criterion for Representation Identifiability in Supervised Learningcited by 2
- 2026Bayes-Sufficient Representations in Supervised Learningcited by 1
- 2026Do Active SAE Feature Planes Carry More Holonomy? A Preregistered Reversal in Gemmacited by 1
- 2026Do Sheaf Neural Networks Use Holonomy? A Measure--Intervene--Control Studycited by 0
- 2026Understanding Differentiable Embeddings Through Differential and Integral Geometrycited by 0
- 2026Activation-Space Order-Swap Geometry: A Site-Asymmetry Auditcited by 0
- 2026Activation-Space Order-Swap Geometry: A Site-Asymmetry Audit26 Aug 2026
- 2026Understanding Differentiable Embeddings Through Differential and Integral Geometry7 Aug 2026
- 2026Do Sheaf Neural Networks Use Holonomy? A Measure--Intervene--Control Study21 Jul 2026
- 2026Do Active SAE Feature Planes Carry More Holonomy? A Preregistered Reversal in Gemma9 Jul 2026
- 2026Bayes-Sufficient Representations in Supervised Learning2 Jun 2026
- 2026A Fiber Criterion for Representation Identifiability in Supervised Learning31 May 2026
- 2026A Gauge Theory of Superposition: Toward a Sheaf-Theoretic Atlas of Neural Representations28 Feb 2026