mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Smoothing the Score Function to Enhance Generalization in Diffusion Models

arXiv 2601.19285 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling

Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion models achieve remarkable generation quality, yet face a fundamental challenge known as memorization, where generated samples can replicate training samples exactly. We develop a theoretical framework to explain this phenomenon by showing that the empirical score function (the score function corresponding to the empirical distribution) is a weighted sum of the score functions of Gaussian distributions, in which the weights are sharp softmax functions. This structure causes individual training samples to dominate the score function, resulting in sampling collapse. In practice, approximating the empirical score function with a neural network can partially alleviate this issue and improve generalization. Our theoretical framework explains why: In training, the neural network learns a smoother approximation of the weighted sum, allowing the sampling process to be influenced by local manifolds rather than single points. Leveraging this insight, we propose two novel methods to further enhance generalization: (1) Noise Unconditioning enables each training sample to adaptively determine its score function weight to increase the effect of more training samples, thereby preventing single-point dominance and mitigating collapse. (2) Temperature Smoothing introduces an explicit parameter to control the smoothness. By increasing the temperature in the softmax weights, we naturally reduce the dominance of any single training sample and mitigate memorization. Experiments across multiple datasets validate our theoretical analysis and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods in improving generalization while maintaining high generation quality.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 4 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.

Builds on

4 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024A Good Score Does not Lead to A Good Generative Model10 Jan
  2. 2023On Memorization in Diffusion Models4 Oct

Other references · 2

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  2. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Score Learning to Discretized Sampling: An End-to-End Generalization Analysis of Diffusion Models
  2. 2025On the Interpolation Effect of Score Smoothing in Diffusion Models
  3. 2025Generalization through variance: how noise shapes inductive biases in diffusion models
  4. 2024The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Gaussian Score Approximation for Diffusion Models and its Applications
  5. 2024Understanding Generalizability of Diffusion Models Requires Rethinking the Hidden Gaussian Structure
  6. 2025Kernel-Smoothed Scores for Denoising Diffusion: A Bias-Variance Study
  7. 2023On the Generalization of Diffusion Model
  8. 2026First Learn, Then Memorize: The Spectral Bias of Diffusion Models