Beyond In-Domain Detection: SpikeScore for Cross-Domain Hallucination Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hallucination detection is critical for deploying large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications. Existing hallucination detection methods achieve strong performance when the training and test data come from the same domain, but they suffer from poor cross-domain generalization. In this paper, we study an important yet overlooked problem, termed generalizable hallucination detection (GHD), which aims to train hallucination detectors on data from a single domain while ensuring robust performance across diverse related domains. In studying GHD, we simulate multi-turn dialogues following LLMs' initial response and observe an interesting phenomenon: hallucination-initiated multi-turn dialogues universally exhibit larger uncertainty fluctuations than factual ones across different domains. Based on the phenomenon, we propose a new score SpikeScore, which quantifies abrupt fluctuations in multi-turn dialogues. Through both theoretical analysis and empirical validation, we demonstrate that SpikeScore achieves strong cross-domain separability between hallucinated and non-hallucinated responses. Experiments across multiple LLMs and benchmarks demonstrate that the SpikeScore-based detection method outperforms representative baselines in cross-domain generalization and surpasses advanced generalization-oriented methods, verifying the effectiveness of our method in cross-domain hallucination detection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 69 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.
Builds on
69 of 82 references.
References · 69
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
38 more
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 674
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
- 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 400
- 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 317
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
- 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 286
- 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 272
- 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 246
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Modelscited by 193
- 2025MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMscited by 171
- 2023Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigationcited by 123
- 2024Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizingcited by 123
- 2022Is Out-of-Distribution Detection Learnable?cited by 109
- 2024ReDeEP: Detecting Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 100
- 2024HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination Detectioncited by 96
- 2025Measuring Sycophancy of Language Models in Multi-turn Dialoguescited by 91
- 2025Reasoning Models Better Express Their Confidencecited by 63
- 2023When Large Language Models contradict humans? Large Language Models' Sycophantic Behaviourcited by 61
- 2024Learning to Clarify: Multi-turn Conversations with Action-Based Contrastive Self-Trainingcited by 53
- 2023Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation via Model Introspectioncited by 44
- 2024In-Context Sharpness as Alerts: An Inner Representation Perspective for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 43
- 2024A Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction through In-context Alignmentcited by 43
- 2023Deficiency of Large Language Models in Finance: An Empirical Examination of Hallucinationcited by 41
- 2025ReVISE: Learning to Refine at Test-Time via Intrinsic Self-Verificationcited by 35
- 2025Real-Time Detection of Hallucinated Entities in Long-Form Generationcited by 33
- 2025Detection and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models: A Mechanistic Perspectivecited by 32
- 2025ICR Probe: Tracking Hidden State Dynamics for Reliable Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 31
- 2024InternalInspector I2: Robust Confidence Estimation in LLMs through Internal Statescited by 29
- 2025A Survey on Multi-Turn Interaction Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 29
- 2024Confidence v.s. Critique: A Decomposition of Self-Correction Capability for LLMscited by 28
50 most cited of 69 All 69 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.