ASEHybrid: When Geometry Matters Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard message-passing graph neural networks (GNNs) often struggle on graphs with low homophily, yet homophily alone does not explain this behavior, as graphs with similar homophily levels can exhibit markedly different performance and some heterophilous graphs remain easy for vanilla GCNs. Recent work suggests that label informativeness (LI), the mutual information between labels of adjacent nodes, provides a more faithful characterization of when graph structure is useful. In this work, we develop a unified theoretical framework that connects curvature-guided rewiring and positional geometry through the lens of label informativeness, and instantiate it in a practical geometry-aware architecture, ASEHybrid. Our analysis provides a necessary-and-sufficient characterization of when geometry-aware GNNs can improve over feature-only baselines: such gains are possible if and only if graph structure carries label-relevant information beyond node features. Theoretically, we relate adjusted homophily and label informativeness to the spectral behavior of label signals under Laplacian smoothing, show that degree-based Forman curvature does not increase expressivity beyond the one-dimensional Weisfeiler--Lehman test but instead reshapes information flow, and establish convergence and Lipschitz stability guarantees for a curvature-guided rewiring process. Empirically, we instantiate ASEHybrid using Forman curvature and Laplacian positional encodings and conduct controlled ablations on Chameleon, Squirrel, Texas, Tolokers, and Minesweeper, observing gains precisely on label-informative heterophilous benchmarks where graph structure provides label-relevant information beyond node features, and no meaningful improvement in high-baseline regimes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.
Builds on
14 of 21 references.
References · 14
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
- 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 548
- 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 478
- 2021Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional Representationscited by 333
- 2019PairNorm: Tackling Oversmoothing in GNNscited by 297
- 2020Random Features Strengthen Graph Neural Networkscited by 186
- 2021Is Homophily a Necessity for Graph Neural Networks?cited by 182
Built on by
Not cited yet.