Estimating Dense-Packed Zone Height in Liquid-Liquid Separation: A Physics-Informed Neural Network Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Separating liquid-liquid dispersions in gravity settlers is critical in chemical, pharmaceutical, and recycling processes. The dense-packed zone height is an important performance and safety indicator but it is often expensive and impractical to measure due to optical limitations. We propose a framework to estimate phase heights by combining a PINN model with readily available volume flow measurements, without requiring phase height measurements during deployment. To this end, a physics-informed neural network (PINN) is first pretrained on synthetic data and physics equations derived from a low-fidelity (approximate) mechanistic model to reduce the need for extensive experimental data. While the mechanistic model is used to generate synthetic training data, only volume balance equations are used in the PINN, as incorporating droplet coalescence and sedimentation submodels would be computationally prohibitive. The pretrained PINN is then fine-tuned with scarce experimental phase height and flow-rate data to capture the actual dynamics of the separator. We then deploy the differentiable PINN as a predictive model in an Extended Kalman Filter inspired state estimation framework, enabling the phase heights to be tracked and updated using flow-rate measurements only. We first test the two-stage trained PINN by forward simulation from a known initial state against the mechanistic model and a non-pretrained PINN. We then evaluate phase height estimation performance with the filter, comparing the two-stage trained PINN with a two-stage trained purely data-driven neural network. All model types are trained and evaluated using ensembles to account for model parameter uncertainty. In all evaluations, the two-stage trained PINN yields the most accurate phase-height estimates.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.
Builds on
12 of 54 references.
References · 12
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
- 2020Model-Based Deep Learningcited by 136
- 2020Transfer learning based multi-fidelity physics informed deep neural networkcited by 68
- 2021The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?cited by 61
- 2021Inverse-Dirichlet Weighting Enables Reliable Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2025Transfer Learning in Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Full Fine-Tuning, Lightweight Fine-Tuning, and Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 14
- 2024Physics-Informed Neural Networks for High-Frequency and Multi-Scale Problems using Transfer Learningcited by 9
- 2024Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Dynamic Process Operations with Limited Physical Knowledge and Datacited by 6
- 2024Fine-Tuning Hybrid Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Vehicle Dynamics Model Estimationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.