mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LegalMALR:Multi-Agent Query Understanding and LLM-Based Reranking for Chinese Statute Retrieval

arXiv 2601.17692 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2026cs.IR cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Legal and financial RAG

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Statute retrieval is essential for legal assistance and judicial decision support, yet real-world legal queries are often implicit, multi-issue, and expressed in colloquial or underspecified forms. These characteristics make it difficult for conventional retrieval-augmented generation pipelines to recover the statutory elements required for accurate retrieval. Dense retrievers focus primarily on the literal surface form of the query, whereas lightweight rerankers lack the legal-reasoning capacity needed to assess statutory applicability. We present LegalMALR, a retrieval framework that integrates a Multi-Agent Query Understanding System (MAS) with a zero-shot large-language-model-based reranking module (LLM Reranker). MAS generates diverse, legally grounded reformulations and conducts iterative dense retrieval to broaden candidate coverage. To stabilise the stochastic behaviour of LLM-generated rewrites, we optimise a unified MAS policy using Generalized Reinforcement Policy Optimization(GRPO). The accumulated candidate set is subsequently evaluated by the LLM Reranker, which performs natural-language legal reasoning to produce the final ranking. We further construct CSAID, a dataset of 118 difficult Chinese legal queries annotated with multiple statutory labels, and evaluate LegalMALR on both CSAID and the public STARD benchmark. Experiments show that LegalMALR substantially outperforms strong Retrieval-augmented generation(RAG) baselines in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining multi-perspective query interpretation, reinforcement-based policy optimisation, and large-model reranking for statute retrieval.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Legal and financial RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2026.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Investigating LLMs as Voting Assistants via Contextual Augmentation: A Case Study on the European Parliament Elections 202411 Jul

Other references · 20

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  3. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  4. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  5. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
  6. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,178
  7. 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 360
  8. 2021Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 203
  9. 2019Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERTcited by 201
  10. 2023Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language Modelscited by 159
  11. 2021Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documentscited by 116
  12. 2023SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 62
8 more
  1. 2025Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
  2. 2023Large Language Models are Strong Zero-Shot Retrievercited by 26
  3. 2023Agent4Ranking: Semantic Robust Ranking via Personalized Query Rewriting Using Multi-agent LLMcited by 18
  4. 2022Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 yearscited by 10
  5. 2021Less is More: Pre-train a Strong Text Encoder for Dense Retrieval Using a Weak Decodercited by 7
  6. 2024Answer Retrieval in Legal Community Question Answeringcited by 4
  7. 2025RankFlow: A Multi-Role Collaborative Reranking Workflow Utilizing Large Language Modelscited by 4
  8. 2025RAR2: Retrieval-Augmented Medical Reasoning via Thought-Driven Retrievalcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026LexPath: A domain-oriented multi-path framework for legal article retrieval ↗
  2. 2026When Rules Learn: A Self-Evolving Agent for Legal Case Retrieval
  3. 2026Legal-R1: Agentic Retrieval for Evidence-Based Legal Reasoning
  4. 2026Legal-DC: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Documents
  5. 2025A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark
  6. 2025CLaw: Benchmarking Chinese Legal Knowledge in Large Language Models - A Fine-grained Corpus and Reasoning Analysis
  7. 2024HyPA-RAG: A Hybrid Parameter Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation System for AI Legal and Policy Applications
  8. 2026From Query to Counsel: Structured Reasoning with a Multi-Agent Framework and Dataset for Legal Consultation