Learning to Ideate for Machine Learning Engineering Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing machine learning engineering (MLE) agents struggle to iteratively optimize their implemented algorithms for effectiveness. To address this, we introduce MLE-Ideator, a dual-agent framework that separates ideation from implementation. In our system, an implementation agent can request strategic help from a dedicated Ideator. We show this approach is effective in two ways. First, in a training-free setup, our framework significantly outperforms implementation-only agent baselines on MLE-Bench. Second, we demonstrate that the Ideator can be trained with reinforcement learning (RL) to generate more effective ideas. With only 1K training samples from 10 MLE tasks, our RL-trained Qwen3-8B Ideator achieves an 11.5% relative improvement compared to its untrained counterpart and surpasses Claude Sonnet 3.5. These results highlights a promising path toward training strategic AI systems for scientific discovery.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.
Builds on
19 of 28 references.
References · 19
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
- 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 405
- 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 339
- 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 206
- 2025Scaling Test-time Compute for LLM Agentscited by 59
- 2025ML-Master: Towards AI-for-AI via Integration of Exploration and Reasoningcited by 57
- 2025Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interactioncited by 34
7 more
- 2025MLRC-Bench: Can Language Agents Solve Machine Learning Research Challenges?cited by 27
- 2025ML-Agent: Reinforcing LLM Agents for Autonomous Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 26
- 2025MLZero: A Multi-Agent System for End-to-end Machine Learning Automationcited by 22
- 2024ProxyLM: Predicting Language Model Performance on Multilingual Tasks via Proxy Modelscited by 20
- 2025RepoMaster: Autonomous Exploration and Understanding of GitHub Repositories for Complex Task Solvingcited by 19
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Machine Learning Engineering Agentscited by 13
- 2025Bootstrapping Task Spaces for Self-Improvementcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026AI Research Preference Modelscited by 7
- 2026AdaMEM: Test-Time Adaptive Memory for Language Agentscited by 4
- 2026ScienceFlow: A long-horizon agent for ML research, scientific discovery and beyondcited by 3
- 2026Can LLM Agents Discover? Evaluating Creativity on ML Engineering Taskscited by 1
- 2026VTOS: Learning to Orchestrate Vision Tools by Co-Searching Solutions and Observerscited by 0
- 2026How Much of a Harness Does a Strong Agent Need for Autonomous ML Engineering?cited by 0
- 2026How Much of a Harness Does a Strong Agent Need for Autonomous ML Engineering?30 Sep 2026
- 2026Can LLM Agents Discover? Evaluating Creativity on ML Engineering Tasks30 Aug 2026
- 2026ScienceFlow: A long-horizon agent for ML research, scientific discovery and beyond14 Aug 2026
- 2026AI Research Preference Models14 Aug 2026
- 2026VTOS: Learning to Orchestrate Vision Tools by Co-Searching Solutions and Observers17 Jun 2026
- 2026AdaMEM: Test-Time Adaptive Memory for Language Agents4 Jun 2026