mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Stability and Recovery for Neural Network Training

arXiv 2601.17483 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training modern neural networks is increasingly fragile, with rare but severe destabilizing updates often causing irreversible divergence or silent performance degradation. Existing optimization methods primarily rely on preventive mechanisms embedded within the optimizer, offering limited ability to detect and recover from instability once it occurs. We introduce a supervisory runtime stability framework that treats optimization as a controlled stochastic process. By isolating an innovation signal derived from secondary measurements, such as validation probes, the framework enables automatic detection and recovery from destabilizing updates without modifying the underlying optimizer. We provide theoretical runtime safety guarantees that formalize bounded degradation and recovery. Our implementation incurs minimal overhead and is compatible with memory-constrained training settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.

Builds on

8 of 16 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
  4. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  5. 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 513
  6. 2019Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step backcited by 336
  7. 2018Online Structured Laplace Approximations For Overcoming Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 201
  8. 2019Practical Deep Learning with Bayesian Principlescited by 158

Built on by

Not cited yet.