mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fingerprinting AI Coding Agents on GitHub

arXiv 2601.17406 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2026cs.SEcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

AI coding agents are reshaping software development through both autonomous and human-mediated pull requests (PRs). When developers use AI agents to generate code under their own accounts, code authorship attribution becomes critical for repository governance, research validity, and understanding modern development practices. We present the first study on fingerprinting AI coding agents, analyzing 33,580 PRs from five major agents (OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Devin, Cursor, Claude Code) to identify behavioral signatures. With 41 features spanning commit messages, PR structure, and code characteristics, we achieve 97.2% F1-score in multi-class agent identification. We uncover distinct fingerprints: Codex shows unique multiline commit patterns (67.5% feature importance), and Claude Code exhibits distinctive code structure (27.2% importance of conditional statements). These signatures reveal that AI coding tools produce detectable behavioral patterns, suggesting potential for identifying AI contributions in software repositories.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.

Builds on

4 of 26 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2022Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Modelscited by 218
  3. 2023Is ChatGPT the Ultimate Programming Assistant -- How far is it?cited by 76
  4. 2025I Know Which LLM Wrote Your Code Last Summer: LLM generated Code Stylometry for Authorship Attributioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Detecting AI Coding Agents in Open Source: A Validated Multi-Method Census of 180 Million Repositories
  2. 2026Security in the Age of AI Teammates: An Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests on GitHub
  3. 2026How AI Coding Agents Modify Code: A Large-Scale Study of GitHub Pull Requests
  4. 2025On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
  5. 2026Investigating Autonomous Agent Contributions in the Wild: Activity Patterns and Code Change over Time
  6. 2026Not All Agents Are Equal: Code Quality and Post-Merge Maintenance Across Five Autonomous Coding Agents in the Wild
  7. 2026Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
  8. 2026Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub