Robust Privacy: Inference-Stage Privacy through Certified Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An adversary observing a model's released prediction can infer sensitive attributes of the queried input, or even reconstruct representatives of the model's training data. The inference interface thus acts as a side channel for privacy leakage. We introduce Robust Privacy (RP), an inference-stage privacy notion inspired by certified robustness: if a model's prediction is provably invariant within a radius-R neighborhood around an input x with confidence at least 1-α, then x enjoys (R,α)-Robust Privacy, under which we prove that any adversary observing the released prediction has at most α/2 advantage in distinguishing x from any input within distance R of x. Building on RP, we formalize Robust Attribute Privacy (RAP), an attribute-level privacy notion that characterizes the set of sensitive-attribute values that remain compatible with a released prediction. On a classification task, RP increases the median length of the RAP-compatible inference interval from 23.50 to 29.96, reducing attribute-inference precision. Model inversion attacks, often treated as a training-stage threat, in fact rely on fine-grained input-output dependence signals leaked through the inference interface; RP masks these signals at the inference stage, reducing attack success rate (ASR) from 73% to 4% on a black-box inversion attack. This direct targeting of the leakage channel enables RP to dominate DP-SGD and randomized response in the privacy-utility tradeoff space: RP retains 98.4% accuracy at 21% ASR, whereas DP-SGD must drop accuracy to 61.7% to reach a comparable ASR. Across both experiments, increasing the smoothing sample size N at fixed noise scale strengthens privacy and improves utility together. Finally, we examine model distillation as a scope boundary and show that RP mitigates attribute-level and instance-level inference-stage privacy leakage.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.
Builds on
37 of 53 references.
References · 37
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
25 more
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
- 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
- 2019The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networkscited by 241
- 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 233
- 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 224
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
- 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 218
- 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
- 2019Branch and Bound for Piecewise Linear Neural Network Verificationcited by 138
- 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 121
- 2020MAZE: Data-Free Model Stealing Attack Using Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimationcited by 99
- 2020Knowledge-Enriched Distributional Model Inversion Attackscited by 65
- 2022Label-Only Model Inversion Attacks via Boundary Repulsioncited by 56
- 2022Are Attribute Inference Attacks Just Imputation?cited by 48
- 2022Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical Estimationcited by 47
- 2022Are Your Sensitive Attributes Private? Novel Model Inversion Attribute Inference Attacks on Classification Modelscited by 42
- 2019Adversarial Neural Network Inversion via Auxiliary Knowledge Alignmentcited by 30
- 2021On the (In)Feasibility of Attribute Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Modelscited by 30
- 2023From Robustness to Privacy and Backcited by 27
- 2019GAMIN: An Adversarial Approach to Black-Box Model Inversioncited by 19
- 2023Certified private data release for sparse Lipschitz functionscited by 7
- 2023Augment then Smooth: Reconciling Differential Privacy with Certified Robustnesscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.