mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Privacy: Inference-Stage Privacy through Certified Robustness

arXiv 2601.17360 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An adversary observing a model's released prediction can infer sensitive attributes of the queried input, or even reconstruct representatives of the model's training data. The inference interface thus acts as a side channel for privacy leakage. We introduce Robust Privacy (RP), an inference-stage privacy notion inspired by certified robustness: if a model's prediction is provably invariant within a radius-R neighborhood around an input x with confidence at least 1-α, then x enjoys (R,α)-Robust Privacy, under which we prove that any adversary observing the released prediction has at most α/2 advantage in distinguishing x from any input within distance R of x. Building on RP, we formalize Robust Attribute Privacy (RAP), an attribute-level privacy notion that characterizes the set of sensitive-attribute values that remain compatible with a released prediction. On a classification task, RP increases the median length of the RAP-compatible inference interval from 23.50 to 29.96, reducing attribute-inference precision. Model inversion attacks, often treated as a training-stage threat, in fact rely on fine-grained input-output dependence signals leaked through the inference interface; RP masks these signals at the inference stage, reducing attack success rate (ASR) from 73% to 4% on a black-box inversion attack. This direct targeting of the leakage channel enables RP to dominate DP-SGD and randomized response in the privacy-utility tradeoff space: RP retains 98.4% accuracy at 21% ASR, whereas DP-SGD must drop accuracy to 61.7% to reach a comparable ASR. Across both experiments, increasing the smoothing sample size N at fixed noise scale strengthens privacy and improves utility together. Finally, we examine model distillation as a scope boundary and show that RP mitigates attribute-level and instance-level inference-stage privacy leakage.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.

Builds on

37 of 53 references.

References · 37

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  8. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  9. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  10. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  11. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  12. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
25 more
  1. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
  2. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
  3. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
  4. 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
  5. 2019The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networkscited by 241
  6. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 233
  7. 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 224
  8. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
  9. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 218
  10. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
  11. 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
  12. 2019Branch and Bound for Piecewise Linear Neural Network Verificationcited by 138
  13. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 121
  14. 2020MAZE: Data-Free Model Stealing Attack Using Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimationcited by 99
  15. 2020Knowledge-Enriched Distributional Model Inversion Attackscited by 65
  16. 2022Label-Only Model Inversion Attacks via Boundary Repulsioncited by 56
  17. 2022Are Attribute Inference Attacks Just Imputation?cited by 48
  18. 2022Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical Estimationcited by 47
  19. 2022Are Your Sensitive Attributes Private? Novel Model Inversion Attribute Inference Attacks on Classification Modelscited by 42
  20. 2019Adversarial Neural Network Inversion via Auxiliary Knowledge Alignmentcited by 30
  21. 2021On the (In)Feasibility of Attribute Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Modelscited by 30
  22. 2023From Robustness to Privacy and Backcited by 27
  23. 2019GAMIN: An Adversarial Approach to Black-Box Model Inversioncited by 19
  24. 2023Certified private data release for sparse Lipschitz functionscited by 7
  25. 2023Augment then Smooth: Reconciling Differential Privacy with Certified Robustnesscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.