Federated Proximal Optimization for Privacy-Preserving Heart Disease Prediction: A Controlled Simulation Study on Non-IID Clinical Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Healthcare institutions have access to valuable patient data that could be of great help in the development of improved diagnostic models, but privacy regulations like HIPAA and GDPR prevent hospitals from directly sharing data with one another. Federated Learning offers a way out to this problem by facilitating collaborative model training without having the raw patient data centralized. However, clinical datasets intrinsically have non-IID (non-independent and identically distributed) features brought about by demographic disparity and diversity in disease prevalence and institutional practices. This paper presents a comprehensive simulation research of Federated Proximal Optimization (FedProx) for Heart Disease prediction based on UCI Heart Disease dataset. We generate realistic non-IID data partitions by simulating four heterogeneous hospital clients from the Cleveland Clinic dataset (303 patients), by inducing statistical heterogeneity by demographic-based stratification. Our experimental results show that FedProx with proximal parameter mu=0.05 achieves 85.00% accuracy, which is better than both centralized learning (83.33%) and isolated local models (78.45% average) without revealing patient privacy. Through generous sheer ablation studies with statistical validation on 50 independent runs we demonstrate that proximal regularization is effective in curbing client drift in heterogeneous environments. This proof-of-concept research offers algorithmic insights and practical deployment guidelines for real-world federated healthcare systems, and thus, our results are directly transferable to hospital IT-administrators, implementing privacy-preserving collaborative learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2026.
Builds on
25 of 72 references.
References · 25
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
13 more
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 950
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
- 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
- 2021Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 541
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 503
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
- 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.