Select or Project? Evaluating Lower-dimensional Vectors for LLM Training Data Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient-based methods for instance-based explanation for large language models (LLMs) are hindered by the immense dimensionality of model gradients. In practice, influence estimation is restricted to a subset of model parameters to make computation tractable, but this subset is often chosen ad hoc and rarely justified by systematic evaluation. This paper investigates if it is better to create low-dimensional representations by selecting a small, architecturally informed subset of model components or by projecting the full gradients into a lower-dimensional space. Using a novel benchmark, we show that a greedily selected subset of components captures the information about training data influence needed for a retrieval task more effectively than either the full gradient or random projection. We further find that this approach is more computationally efficient than random projection, demonstrating that targeted component selection is a practical strategy for making instance-based explanations of large models more computationally feasible.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 41 references.
References · 24
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2024OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinementcited by 247
12 more
- 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2cited by 229
- 2023Does Circuit Analysis Interpretability Scale? Evidence from Multiple Choice Capabilities in Chinchillacited by 149
- 2024MAmmoTH2: Scaling Instructions from the Webcited by 145
- 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 135
- 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
- 2022Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributionscited by 115
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 81
- 2019Data Cleansing for Models Trained with SGDcited by 67
- 2023Sequential Integrated Gradients: a simple but effective method for explaining language modelscited by 52
- 2022First is Better Than Last for Language Data Influencecited by 34
- 2024Token-wise Influential Training Data Retrieval for Large Language Modelscited by 20
- 2026Compact Example-Based Explanations for Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.