mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data-Driven Conditional Flexibility Index

arXiv 2601.16028 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the increasing flexibilization of processes, determining robust scheduling decisions has become an important goal. Traditionally, the flexibility index has been used to identify safe operating schedules by approximating the admissible uncertainty region using simple admissible uncertainty sets, such as hypercubes. Presently, available contextual information, such as forecasts, has not been considered to define the admissible uncertainty set when determining the flexibility index. We propose the conditional flexibility index (CFI), which extends the traditional flexibility index in two ways: by learning the parametrized admissible uncertainty set from historical data and by using contextual information to make the admissible uncertainty set conditional. This is achieved using a normalizing flow that learns a bijective mapping from a Gaussian base distribution to the data distribution. The admissible latent uncertainty set is constructed as a hypersphere in the latent space and mapped to the data space. By incorporating contextual information, the CFI provides a more informative estimate of flexibility by defining admissible uncertainty sets in regions that are more likely to be relevant under given conditions. Using an illustrative example, we show that no general statement can be made about data-driven admissible uncertainty sets outperforming simple sets, or conditional sets outperforming unconditional ones. However, both data-driven and conditional admissible uncertainty sets ensure that only regions of the uncertain parameter space containing realizations are considered. We apply the CFI to a security-constrained unit commitment example and demonstrate that the CFI can improve scheduling quality by incorporating temporal information.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2026.

Builds on

11 of 64 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  2. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  3. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  4. 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 588
  5. 2013Data-Driven Robust Optimizationcited by 84
  6. 2018Global Deterministic Optimization with Artificial Neural Networks Embeddedcited by 32
  7. 2021Principal Component Density Estimation for Scenario Generation Using Normalizing Flowscited by 10
  8. 2017Learning-based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guaranteescited by 9
  9. 2021Validation Methods for Energy Time Series Scenarios from Deep Generative Modelscited by 5
  10. 2021A Mixed-Integer Conic Programming Formulation for Computing the Flexibility Index under Multivariate Gaussian Uncertaintycited by 1
  11. 2024Optimizing Flexibility in Power Systems by Maximizing the Region of Manageable Uncertaintiescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.