mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FARM: Field-Aware Resolution Model for Intelligent Trigger-Action Automation

arXiv 2601.15687 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trigger-Action Programming (TAP) platforms such as IFTTT and Zapier enable Web of Things (WoT) automation by composing event-driven rules across heterogeneous services. A TAP applet links a trigger to an action and must bind trigger outputs (ingredients) to action inputs (fields) to be executable. Prior work largely treats TAP as service-level prediction from natural language, which often yields non-executable applets that still require manual configuration. We study the function-level configuration problem: generating complete applets with correct ingredient-to-field bindings. We propose FARM (Field-Aware Resolution Model), a two-stage architecture for automated applet generation with full configuration. Stage 1 trains contrastive dual encoders with selective layer freezing over schema-enriched representations, retrieving candidates from 1,724 trigger functions and 1,287 action functions (2.2M possible trigger-action pairs). Stage 2 performs selection and configuration using an LLM-based multi-agent pipeline. It includes intent analysis, trigger selection, action selection via cross-schema scoring, and configuration verification. Agents coordinate through shared state and agreement-based selection. FARM achieves 81% joint accuracy on Gold (62% Noisy, 70% One-shot) at the function level, where both trigger and action functions must match the ground truth. For comparison with service-level baselines, we map functions to their parent services and evaluate at the service level. FARM reaches 81% joint accuracy and improves over TARGE by 23 percentage points. FARM also generates ingredient-to-field bindings, producing executable automation configurations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Android in the Zoo: Chain-of-Action-Thought for GUI Agents
  2. 2025Beyond Syntax: Action Semantics Learning for App Agents
  3. 2023You Only Look at Screens: Multimodal Chain-of-Action Agents
  4. 2026KAIJU: An Executive Kernel for Intent-Gated Execution of LLM Agents
  5. 2024CAAP: Context-Aware Action Planning Prompting to Solve Computer Tasks with Front-End UI Only
  6. 2025AgentProg: Empowering Long-Horizon GUI Agents with Program-Guided Context Management
  7. 2026LeapBot-JAC: Joint Action Chains for World Action Models
  8. 2025Tapas Are Free! Training-Free Adaptation of Programmatic Agents via LLM-Guided Program Synthesis in Dynamic Environments