Training-Free and Interpretable Hateful Video Detection via Multi-stage Adversarial Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hateful videos pose serious risks by amplifying discrimination, inciting violence, and undermining online safety. Existing training-based hateful video detection methods are constrained by limited training data and lack of interpretability, while directly prompting large vision-language models often struggle to deliver reliable hate detection. To address these challenges, this paper introduces MARS, a training-free Multi-stage Adversarial ReaSoning framework that enables reliable and interpretable hateful content detection. MARS begins with the objective description of video content, establishing a neutral foundation for subsequent analysis. Building on this, it develops evidence-based reasoning that supports potential hateful interpretations, while in parallel incorporating counter-evidence reasoning to capture plausible non-hateful perspectives. Finally, these perspectives are synthesized into a conclusive and explainable decision. Extensive evaluation on two real-world datasets shows that MARS achieves up to 10% improvement under certain backbones and settings compared to other training-free approaches and outperforms state-of-the-art training-based methods on one dataset. In addition, MARS produces human-understandable justifications, thereby supporting compliance oversight and enhancing the transparency of content moderation workflows. The code is available at https://github.com/Multimodal-Intelligence-Lab-MIL/MARS.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 407
- 2025Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithfulcited by 170
- 2023HateMM: A Multi-Modal Dataset for Hate Video Classificationcited by 42
- 2024MultiHateClip: A Multilingual Benchmark Dataset for Hateful Video Detection on YouTube and Bilibilicited by 25
- 2025Cross-Modal Transfer from Memes to Videos: Addressing Data Scarcity in Hateful Video Detectioncited by 9
- 2025Towards a Robust Framework for Multimodal Hate Detection: A Study on Video vs. Image-based Contentcited by 9
- 2025Enhanced Multimodal Hate Video Detection via Channel-wise and Modality-wise Fusioncited by 8
- 2025Revealing Temporal Label Noise in Multimodal Hateful Video Classificationcited by 3
- 2024Attentive Fusion: A Transformer-based Approach to Multimodal Hate Speech Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reasoning-Aware Multimodal Fusion for Hateful Video Detection
- 2026Decoding Multimodal Cues: Unveiling the Implicit Meaning Behind Hateful Videos
- 2026CLARA: Clip-Level Multimodal Alignment with VLM-Derived Rationales for Hateful Video Detection
- 2023HARE: Explainable Hate Speech Detection with Step-by-Step Reasoning
- 2026TANDEM: Temporal-Aware Neural Detection for Multimodal Hate Speech
- 2026Learn Before You Judge: Progressive Knowledge-to-Decision Alignment for Explainable Hateful Meme Detection
- 2026FBHM: Functional Benchmarking and Steering of VLMs for Hateful Meme Detection
- 2022ToKen: Task Decomposition and Knowledge Infusion for Few-Shot Hate Speech Detection