Enhancing Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection via the Refinement of Foreground and Background
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
CLIP-based foreground-background (FG-BG) decomposition methods have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in improving few-shot out-of-distribution (OOD) detection performance. However, existing approaches still suffer from several limitations. For background regions obtained from decomposition, existing methods adopt a uniform suppression strategy for all patches, overlooking the varying contributions of different patches to the prediction. For foreground regions, existing methods fail to adequately consider that some local patches may exhibit appearance or semantic similarity to other classes, which may mislead the training process. To address these issues, we propose a new plug-and-play framework. This framework consists of three core components: (1) a Foreground-Background Decomposition module, which follows previous FG-BG methods to separate an image into foreground and background regions; (2) an Adaptive Background Suppression module, which adaptively weights patch classification entropy; and (3) a Confusable Foreground Rectification module, which identifies and rectifies confusable foreground patches. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed plug-and-play framework significantly improves the performance of existing FG-BG decomposition methods. Code is available at: https://github.com/lounwb/FoBoR.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.
Builds on
28 of 35 references.
References · 28
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
16 more
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 351
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2022Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Vision-Language Representationscited by 215
- 2023OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 178
- 2023In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluationcited by 132
- 2023LoCoOp: Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection via Prompt Learningcited by 107
- 2022Partial and Asymmetric Contrastive Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 44
- 2023ID-like Prompt Learning for Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 42
- 2021Are Vision Transformers Robust to Patch Perturbations?cited by 39
- 2023GL-MCM: Global and Local Maximum Concept Matching for Zero-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 36
- 2023Out-of-distribution Detection Learning with Unreliable Out-of-distribution Sourcescited by 31
- 2023DiffGuard: Semantic Mismatch-Guided Out-of-Distribution Detection using Pre-trained Diffusion Modelscited by 25
- 2024Self-Calibrated Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 15
- 2024OpenCIL: Benchmarking Out-of-Distribution Detection in Class-Incremental Learningcited by 7
- 2025Background Prompt for Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.