Learning and extrapolating scale-invariant processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning (ML) has deeply changed some fields recently, like Language and Vision and we may expect it to be relevant also to the analysis of of complex systems. Here we want to tackle the question of how and to which extent can one regress scale-free processes, i.e. processes displaying power law behavior, like earthquakes or avalanches? We are interested in predicting the large ones, i.e. rare events in the training set which therefore require extrapolation capabilities of the model. For this we consider two paradigmatic problems that are statistically self-similar. The first one is a 2-dimensional fractional Gaussian field obeying linear dynamics, self-similar by construction and amenable to exact analysis. The second one is the Abelian sandpile model, exhibiting self-organized criticality. The emerging paradigm of Geometric Deep Learning shows that including known symmetries into the model's architecture is key to success. Here one may hope to extrapolate only by leveraging scale invariance. This is however a peculiar symmetry, as it involves possibly non-trivial coarse-graining operations and anomalous scaling. We perform experiments on various existing architectures like U-net, Riesz network (scale invariant by construction), or our own proposals: a wavelet-decomposition based Graph Neural Network (with discrete scale symmetry), a Fourier embedding layer and a Fourier-Mellin Neural Operator. Based on these experiments and a complete characterization of the linear case, we identify the main issues relative to spectral biases and coarse-grained representations, and discuss how to alleviate them with the relevant inductive biases.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.
Builds on
23 of 61 references.
References · 23
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
- 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,429
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
- 2018Tensor field networks: Rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3D point cloudscited by 746
- 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
- 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 397
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 241
11 more
- 2019Deep Scale-spaces: Equivariance Over Scalecited by 114
- 2019Scale-Equivariant Steerable Networkscited by 110
- 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 65
- 2022Wavelet Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 62
- 2014Locally Scale-Invariant Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 34
- 2020Scale-covariant and scale-invariant Gaussian derivative networkscited by 25
- 2023Truly Scale-Equivariant Deep Nets with Fourier Layerscited by 16
- 2023Riesz networks: scale invariant neural networks in a single forward passcited by 8
- 2025Robustifying Fourier Features Embeddings for Implicit Neural Representationscited by 6
- 2025A theoretical framework for overfitting in energy-based modelingcited by 5
- 2022Rotation-equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Learning Glassy Liquids Representationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Neural Renormalization Group Flow for Percolationcited by 0
- 2026Neural Renormalization Group Flow for Percolation27 Aug 2026