mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ARFT-Transformer: Modeling Metric Dependencies for Cross-Project Aging-Related Bug Prediction

arXiv 2601.14731 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2026cs.SE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Software systems that run for long periods often suffer from software aging, which is typically caused by Aging-Related Bugs (ARBs). To mitigate the risk of ARBs early in the development phase, ARB prediction has been introduced into software aging research. However, due to the difficulty of collecting ARBs, within-project ARB prediction faces the challenge of data scarcity, leading to the proposal of cross-project ARB prediction. This task faces two major challenges: 1) domain adaptation issue caused by distribution difference between source and target projects; and 2) severe class imbalance between ARB-prone and ARB-free samples. Although various methods have been proposed for cross-project ARB prediction, existing approaches treat the input metrics independently and often neglect the rich inter-metric dependencies, which can lead to overlapping information and misjudgment of metric importance, potentially affecting the model's performance. Moreover, they typically use cross-entropy as the loss function during training, which cannot distinguish the difficulty of sample classification. To overcome these limitations, we propose ARFT-Transformer, a transformer-based cross-project ARB prediction framework that introduces a metric-level multi-head attention mechanism to capture metric interactions and incorporates Focal Loss function to effectively handle class imbalance. Experiments conducted on three large-scale open-source projects demonstrate that ARFT-Transformer on average outperforms state-of-the-art cross-project ARB prediction methods in both single-source and multi-source cases, achieving up to a 29.54% and 19.92% improvement in Balance metric.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.

Builds on

13 of 55 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,329
  4. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
  5. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
  6. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  7. 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 654
  8. 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 579
  9. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  10. 2022On The Effects Of Data Normalisation For Domain Adaptation On EEG Datacited by 13
  11. 2022On the Use of Deep Learning in Software Defect Predictioncited by 6
  12. 2014The Correlation among Software Complexity Metrics with Case Studycited by 2
1 more
  1. 2018The Impact of Correlated Metrics on Defect Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.