mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An LLM Agent-based Framework for Whaling Countermeasures

arXiv 2601.14606 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

With the spread of generative AI in recent years, attacks known as Whaling have become a serious threat. Whaling is a form of social engineering that targets important high-authority individuals within organizations and uses sophisticated fraudulent emails. In the context of Japanese universities, faculty members frequently hold positions that combine research leadership with authority within institutional workflows. This structural characteristic leads to the wide public disclosure of high-value information such as publications, grants, and detailed researcher profiles. Such extensive information exposure enables the construction of highly precise target profiles using generative AI. This raises concerns that Whaling attacks based on high-precision profiling by generative AI will become prevalent. In this study, we propose a Whaling countermeasure framework for university faculty members that constructs personalized defense profiles and uses large language model (LLM)-based agents. We design agents that (i) build vulnerability profiles for each target from publicly available information on faculty members, (ii) identify potential risk scenarios relevant to Whaling defense based on those profiles, (iii) construct defense profiles corresponding to the vulnerabilities and anticipated risks, and (iv) analyze Whaling emails using the defense profiles. Furthermore, we conduct a preliminary risk-assessment experiment. The results indicate that the proposed method can produce judgments accompanied by explanations of response policies that are consistent with the work context of faculty members who are Whaling targets. The findings also highlight practical challenges and considerations for future operational deployment and systematic evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.

Builds on

4 of 41 references.

References · 4

  1. 2024KnowPhish: Large Language Models Meet Multimodal Knowledge Graphs for Enhancing Reference-Based Phishing Detectioncited by 33
  2. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models' Capability to Launch Fully Automated Spear Phishing Campaigns: Validated on Human Subjectscited by 17
  3. 2024APOLLO: A GPT-based tool to detect phishing emails and generate explanations that warn userscited by 6
  4. 2025E-PhishGen: Unlocking Novel Research in Phishing Email Detectioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Assessing Spear-Phishing Website Generation in Large Language Model Coding Agents
  2. 2026Detection of adversarial intent in Human-AI teams using LLMs
  3. 2025Personalized Attacks of Social Engineering in Multi-turn Conversations: LLM Agents for Simulation and Detection
  4. 2026Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy: A Survey of Dual-Use Risks, AI-Generated Malware, Explainability, and Defensive Strategies
  5. 2026Toward Reliable, Safe, and Secure LLMs for Scientific Applications
  6. 2026Honeyquest for LLMs: Rethinking Cyber Deception for AI Attackers
  7. 2024The Shadow of Fraud: The Emerging Danger of AI-powered Social Engineering and its Possible Cure
  8. 2024When LLMs Go Online: The Emerging Threat of Web-Enabled LLMs