Complex Aircraft Maneuvering using Reinforcement-Learning-Augmented Sliding Mode-Based Control
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for robot navigation and UAV control
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning-based controllers leverage nonlinear couplings and enhance transients but seldom offer guarantees under tight input constraints. Robust feedback like sliding-mode control (SMC) provides these guarantees but is conservative in isolation. This paper creates a learning-augmented framework where a deep reinforcement learning policy produces learned nominal maneuvering commands and an SMC law imposes actuator limits, bounds learned authority and guarantees robustness. The policy is modeled as a matched, bounded input, and Lyapunov-based conditions link SMC gains to the nominal compensation mismatch, guaranteeing stability under saturation. This formulation is applicable to nonlinear, underactuated plants with hard constraints. To illustrate the methodology, the method is applied to a six-degree-of-freedom aircraft model and compared with Reinforcement Learning and isolated SMC. Simulation results show that the hybrid controller improves transient behavior and reduces control oscillations compared to standalone RL and SMC controllers. A Monte Carlo evaluation over 1000 randomized initial flight conditions further confirms that the controller consistently converges to the target attitude with small terminal tracking error, demonstrating robustness to variation in the initial-condition envelope. Even using it with partially trained policies, SMC component of the control stabilizes transients, whereas fully trained policies provide faster convergence, reduced constraint violations, and robustness. These results illustrate that learning-augmented control offers superior performance with robustness guarantees under tight input constraints.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for robot navigation and UAV control, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 7 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.
Builds on
7 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Deep Reinforcement Learning based Control Design for Aircraft Recovery from Loss-of-Control Scenario10 Jan
Other references · 6
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2019Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Robust MPCcited by 85
- 2022Hybrid LMC: Hybrid Learning and Model-based Control for Wheeled Humanoid Robot via Ensemble Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Learning-based control of a single-DOF Aero system
- 2026Safe Learning-Based Adaptive Augmentation Control for Fixed-Wing UAV under Uncertainty ↗
- 2025Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Robust Control of Fixed-Wing Aircraft under Model Uncertainty
- 2025MPC-Guided Safe Reinforcement Learning and Lipschitz-Based Filtering for Structured Nonlinear Systems
- 2025RL-based Control of UAS Subject to Significant Disturbance
- 2025Reinforcement learning in pursuit-evasion differential game: safety, stability and robustness
- 2024Safe Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Lyapunov Functions
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Based Prediction of PID Controller Gains for Quadrotor UAVs