Adversarial Defense in Vision-Language Models: An Overview
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread use of Vision Language Models (VLMs, e.g. CLIP) has raised concerns about their vulnerability to sophisticated and imperceptible adversarial attacks. These attacks could compromise model performance and system security in cross-modal tasks. To address this challenge, three main defense paradigms have been proposed: Training-time Defense, Test-time Adaptation Defense, and Training-free Defense. Training-time Defense involves modifying the training process, typically through adversarial fine-tuning to improve the robustness to adversarial examples. While effective, this approach requires substantial computational resources and may not generalize across all adversarial attacks. Test-time Adaptation Defense focuses on adapting the model at inference time by updating its parameters to handle unlabeled adversarial examples, offering flexibility but often at the cost of increased complexity and computational overhead. Training-free Defense avoids modifying the model itself, instead focusing on altering the adversarial inputs or their feature embeddings, which enforces input perturbations to mitigate the impact of attacks without additional training. This survey reviews the latest advancements in adversarial defense strategies for VLMs, highlighting the strengths and limitations of such approaches and discussing ongoing challenges in enhancing the robustness of VLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 10 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2026.
Builds on
10 of 11 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning15 Apr
- 2025Double Visual Defense: Adversarial Pre-training and Instruction Tuning for Improving Vision-Language Model Robustness16 Jan
- 2024TAPT: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Robust Inference in Vision-Language Models20 Nov
- 2024Text-Guided Attention is All You Need for Zero-Shot Robustness in Vision-Language Models29 Oct
- 2024Revisiting the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Language Models: a Multimodal Perspective30 Apr
- 2024One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models4 Mar
- 2022Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models14 Dec
Other references · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Adversarial Attacks Already Tell the Answer: Directional Bias-Guided Test-time Defense for Vision-Language Models
- 2024A Hybrid Defense Strategy for Boosting Adversarial Robustness in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Navigating the Trade-off: A Synthesis of Defensive Strategies for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Beyond False Stability: High-Noise Drift Gating for Test-Time Adversarial Defenses in Vision-Language Models
- 2024Multimodal Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models by Leveraging One-To-Many Relationships
- 2025Diversifying Counterattacks: Orthogonal Exploration for Robust CLIP Inference
- 2025TTP: Test-Time Padding for Adversarial Detection and Robust Adaptation on Vision-Language Models
- 2023Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models