mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Automating Parameter Selection in Deep Image Prior for Fluorescence Microscopy Image Denoising via Similarity-Based Parameter Transfer

arXiv 2601.12055 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised deep image prior (DIP) addresses shortcomings of training data requirements and limited generalization associated with supervised deep learning. The performance of DIP depends on the network architecture and the stopping point of its iterative process. Optimizing these parameters for a new image requires time, restricting DIP application in domains where many images need to be processed. Focusing on fluorescence microscopy data, we hypothesize that similar images share comparable optimal parameter configurations for DIP-based denoising, potentially enabling optimization-free DIP for fluorescence microscopy. We generated a calibration (n=110) and validation set (n=55) of semantically different images from an open-source dataset for a network architecture search targeted towards ideal U-net architectures and stopping points. The calibration set represented our transfer basis. The validation set enabled the assessment of which image similarity criterion yields the best results. We then implemented AUTO-DIP, a pipeline for automatic parameter transfer, and compared it to the originally published DIP configuration (baseline) and a state-of-the-art image-specific variational denoising approach. We show that a parameter transfer from the calibration dataset to a test image based on only image metadata similarity (e.g., microscope type, imaged specimen) leads to similar and better performance than a transfer based on quantitative image similarity measures. AUTO-DIP outperforms the baseline DIP (DIP with original DIP parameters) as well as the variational denoising approaches for several open-source test datasets of varying complexity, particularly for very noisy inputs. Applications to locally acquired fluorescence microscopy images further proved superiority of AUTO-DIP.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2026.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,656
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,082
  3. 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,097
  4. 2019DeepRED: Deep Image Prior Powered by REDcited by 84
  5. 2018A Poisson-Gaussian Denoising Dataset with Real Fluorescence Microscopy Imagescited by 70
  6. 2021Early Stopping for Deep Image Priorcited by 44
  7. 2021Rethinking Deep Image Prior for Denoisingcited by 38
  8. 2019The Spectral Bias of the Deep Image Priorcited by 20
  9. 2020NAS-DIP: Learning Deep Image Prior with Neural Architecture Searchcited by 20
  10. 2020Solving Inverse Problems with Hybrid Deep Image Priors: the challenge of preventing overfittingcited by 18
  11. 2021Self-Validation: Early Stopping for Single-Instance Deep Generative Priorscited by 15
  12. 2020Neural Architecture Search for Deep Image Priorcited by 14
2 more
  1. 2021ISNAS-DIP: Image-Specific Neural Architecture Search for Deep Image Priorcited by 12
  2. 2023The Devil is in the Upsampling: Architectural Decisions Made Simpler for Denoising with Deep Image Priorcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.