textitFocaLogic: Logic-Based Interpretation of Visual Model Decisions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpretability of modern visual models is crucial, particularly in high-stakes applications. However, existing interpretability methods typically suffer from either reliance on white-box model access or insufficient quantitative rigor. To address these limitations, we introduce FocaLogic, a novel model-agnostic framework designed to interpret and quantify visual model decision-making through logic-based representations. FocaLogic identifies minimal interpretable subsets of visual regions-termed visual focuses-that decisively influence model predictions. It translates these visual focuses into precise and compact logical expressions, enabling transparent and structured interpretations. Additionally, we propose a suite of quantitative metrics, including focus precision, recall, and divergence, to objectively evaluate model behavior across diverse scenarios. Empirical analyses demonstrate FocaLogic's capability to uncover critical insights such as training-induced concentration, increasing focus accuracy through generalization, and anomalous focuses under biases and adversarial attacks. Overall, FocaLogic provides a systematic, scalable, and quantitative solution for interpreting visual models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 31 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,094
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
12 more
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2024Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Taskscited by 914
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
- 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
- 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 159
- 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
- 2018Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Modelscited by 55
- 2020Adapting Grad-CAM for Embedding Networkscited by 21
- 2024Towards the Dynamics of a DNN Learning Symbolic Interactionscited by 13
- 2025HiBug2: Efficient and Interpretable Error Slice Discovery for Comprehensive Model Debuggingcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.