mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Extreme Value Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2601.12008 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring safety is a critical challenge in applying Reinforcement Learning (RL) to real-world scenarios. Constrained Reinforcement Learning (CRL) addresses this by maximizing returns under predefined constraints, typically formulated as the expected cumulative cost. However, expectation-based constraints overlook rare but high-impact extreme value events in the tail distribution, such as black swan incidents, which can lead to severe constraint violations. To address this issue, we propose the Extreme Value policy Optimization (EVO) algorithm, leveraging Extreme Value Theory (EVT) to model and exploit extreme reward and cost samples, reducing constraint violations. EVO introduces an extreme quantile optimization objective to explicitly capture extreme samples in the cost tail distribution. Additionally, we propose an extreme prioritization mechanism during replay, amplifying the learning signal from rare but high-impact extreme samples. Theoretically, we establish upper bounds on expected constraint violations during policy updates, guaranteeing strict constraint satisfaction at a zero-violation quantile level. Further, we demonstrate that EVO achieves a lower probability of constraint violations than expectation-based methods and exhibits lower variance than quantile regression methods. Extensive experiments show that EVO significantly reduces constraint violations during training while maintaining competitive policy performance compared to baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  4. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  5. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  6. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  7. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  8. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
  9. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
  10. 2020Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimizationcited by 131
  11. 2020CRPO: A New Approach for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Convergence Guaranteecited by 128
  12. 2023OmniSafe: An Infrastructure for Accelerating Safe Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 76
10 more
  1. 2021Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  2. 2022Saute RL: Almost Surely Safe Reinforcement Learning Using State Augmentationcited by 63
  3. 2022Constrained Update Projection Approach to Safe Policy Optimizationcited by 55
  4. 2022Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with a Safety Editor Policycited by 28
  5. 2019Learning Robust Options by Conditional Value at Risk Optimizationcited by 16
  6. 2023Scalable Primal-Dual Actor-Critic Method for Safe Multi-Agent RL with General Utilitiescited by 15
  7. 2022Quantile Constrained Reinforcement Learning: A Reinforcement Learning Framework Constraining Outage Probabilitycited by 9
  8. 2022Effects of Safety State Augmentation on Safe Explorationcited by 5
  9. 2023Extreme Risk Mitigation in Reinforcement Learning using Extreme Value Theorycited by 5
  10. 2024Exterior Penalty Policy Optimization with Penalty Metric Network under Constraintscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.