mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Tokens: Concept-Level Training Objectives for LLMs

arXiv 2601.11791 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The next-token prediction (NTP) objective has been foundational in the development of modern large language models (LLMs), driving advances in fluency and generalization. However, NTP operates at the textittoken level, treating deviations from a single reference continuation as errors even when alternative continuations are equally plausible or semantically equivalent (e.g., ``mom'' vs. ``mother''). As a result, token-level loss can penalize valid abstractions, paraphrases, or conceptually correct reasoning paths, biasing models toward surface form rather than underlying meaning. This mismatch between the training signal and semantic correctness motivates learning objectives that operate over higher-level representations. We propose a shift from token-level to concept-level prediction, where concepts group multiple surface forms of the same idea (e.g., ``mom,'' ``mommy,'' ``mother'' rightarrow textitMOTHER). We introduce various methods for integrating conceptual supervision into LLM training and show that concept-aware models achieve lower perplexity, improved robustness under domain shift, and stronger performance than NTP-based models on diverse NLP benchmarks. This suggests textitconcept-level supervision as an improved training signal that better aligns LLMs with human semantic abstractions.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2026.

Builds on

9 of 16 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  3. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  4. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  5. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  6. 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 263
  7. 2018Contextual Augmentation: Data Augmentation by Words with Paradigmatic Relationscited by 201
  8. 2019SenseBERT: Driving Some Sense into BERTcited by 73
  9. 2025From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for Meaningcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Unraveling Token Prediction Refinement and Identifying Essential Layers in Language Models
  2. 2024Improving Self Consistency in LLMs through Probabilistic Tokenization
  3. 2026Next Concept Prediction in Discrete Latent Space Leads to Stronger Language Models
  4. 2026Say Anything but This: When Tokenizer Betrays Reasoning in LLMs
  5. 2024Beyond the Black Box: A Statistical Model for LLM Reasoning and Inference
  6. 2025LLM Pretraining with Continuous Concepts
  7. 2024Extending Token Computation for LLM Reasoning
  8. 2025Alternatives To Next Token Prediction In Text Generation -- A Survey