mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Objective Pareto-Front Optimization for Efficient Adaptive VVC Streaming

arXiv 2601.10607 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2026eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adaptive video streaming has facilitated improved video streaming over the past years. A balance among coding performance objectives such as bitrate, video quality, and decoding complexity is required to achieve efficient, content- and codec-dependent, adaptive video streaming. This paper proposes a multi-objective Pareto-front (PF) optimization framework to construct quality-monotonic, content-adaptive bitrate ladders Versatile Video Coding (VVC) streaming that jointly optimize video quality, bitrate, and decoding time, which is used as a practical proxy for decoding energy. Two strategies are introduced: the Joint Rate-Quality-Time Pareto Front (JRQT-PF) and the Joint Quality-Time Pareto Front (JQT-PF), each exploring different tradeoff formulations and objective prioritizations. The ladders are constructed under quality monotonicity constraints during adaptive streaming to ensure a consistent Quality of Experience (QoE). Experiments are conducted on a large-scale UHD dataset (Inter-4K), with quality assessed using PSNR, VMAF, and XPSNR, and complexity measured via decoding time and energy consumption. The JQT-PF method achieves 11.76% average bitrate savings while reducing average decoding time by 0.29% to maintain the same XPSNR, compared to a widely-used fixed ladder. More aggressive configurations yield up to 27.88% bitrate savings at the cost of increased complexity. The JRQT-PF strategy, on the other hand, offers more controlled tradeoffs, achieving 6.38 % bitrate savings and 6.17 % decoding time reduction. This framework outperforms existing methods, including fixed ladders, VMAF- and XPSNR-based dynamic resolution selection, and complexity-aware benchmarks. The results confirm that PF optimization with decoding time constraints enables sustainable, high-quality streaming tailored to network and device capabilities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.

Builds on

13 of 53 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020A Technical Overview of AV1cited by 46
  2. 2019Comyco: Quality-Aware Adaptive Video Streaming via Imitation Learningcited by 11
  3. 2021Efficient Bitrate Ladder Construction for Content-Optimized Adaptive Video Streamingcited by 7
  4. 2021VMAF-based Bitrate Ladder Estimation for Adaptive Streamingcited by 4
  5. 2022Ensemble Learning for Efficient VVC Bitrate Ladder Predictioncited by 4
  6. 2023Green Video Complexity Analysis for Efficient Encoding in Adaptive Video Streamingcited by 4
  7. 2023Bitrate Ladder Construction using Visual Information Fidelitycited by 3
  8. 2022Decoding-Energy-Rate-Distortion Optimization for Video Codingcited by 2
  9. 2022On the benefit of parameter-driven approaches for the modeling and the prediction of Satisfied User Ratio for compressed videocited by 2
  10. 2023Convex Hull Prediction Methods for Bitrate Ladder Construction: Design, Evaluation, and Comparisoncited by 2
  11. 2024Towards AI-Assisted Sustainable Adaptive Video Streaming Systems: Tutorial and Surveycited by 2
  12. 2022Estimating the HEVC Decoding Energy Using the Decoder Processing Timecited by 1
1 more
  1. 2022Optimized Decoding-Energy-Aware Encoding in Practical VVC Implementationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.