mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Jordan-Segmentable Masks: A Topology-Aware definition for characterizing Binary Image Segmentation

arXiv 2601.10577 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.NA math.ATcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image segmentation plays a central role in computer vision. However, widely used evaluation metrics, whether pixel-wise, region-based, or boundary-focused, often struggle to capture the structural and topological coherence of a segmentation. In many practical scenarios, such as medical imaging or object delineation, small inaccuracies in boundary, holes, or fragmented predictions can result in high metric scores, despite the fact that the resulting masks fail to preserve the object global shape or connectivity. This highlights a limitation of conventional metrics: they are unable to assess whether a predicted segmentation partitions the image into meaningful interior and exterior regions. In this work, we introduce a topology-aware notion of segmentation based on the Jordan Curve Theorem, and adapted for use in digital planes. We define the concept of a Jordan-segmentatable mask, which is a binary segmentation whose structure ensures a topological separation of the image domain into two connected components. We analyze segmentation masks through the lens of digital topology and homology theory, extracting a 4-curve candidate from the mask, verifying its topological validity using Betti numbers. A mask is considered Jordan-segmentatable when this candidate forms a digital 4-curve with β0 = β1 = 1, or equivalently when its complement splits into exactly two 8-connected components. This framework provides a mathematically rigorous, unsupervised criterion with which to assess the structural coherence of segmentation masks. By combining digital Jordan theory and homological invariants, our approach provides a valuable alternative to standard evaluation metrics, especially in applications where topological correctness must be preserved.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.

Builds on

5 of 31 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
  2. 2019FSS-1000: A 1000-Class Dataset for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 160
  3. 2016A Survey on Object Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Imagescited by 78
  4. 2022Towards a Guideline for Evaluation Metrics in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 60
  5. 2021Rethinking Semantic Segmentation Evaluation for Explainability and Model Selectioncited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.