mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MERGETUNE: Continued Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2601.10497 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP often leads to catastrophic forgetting of pretrained knowledge. Prior work primarily aims to mitigate forgetting during adaptation; however, forgetting often remains inevitable during this process. We introduce a novel paradigm, continued fine-tuning (CFT), which seeks to recover pretrained knowledge after a zero-shot model has already been adapted. We propose a simple, model-agnostic CFT strategy (named MERGETUNE) guided by linear mode connectivity (LMC), which can be applied post hoc to existing fine-tuned models without requiring architectural changes. Given a fine-tuned model, we continue fine-tuning its trainable parameters (e.g., soft prompts or linear heads) to search for a continued model which has two low-loss paths to the zero-shot (e.g., CLIP) and the fine-tuned (e.g., CoOp) solutions. By exploiting the geometry of the loss landscape, the continued model implicitly merges the two solutions, restoring pretrained knowledge lost in the fine-tuned counterpart. A challenge is that the vanilla LMC constraint requires data replay from the pretraining task. We approximate this constraint for the zero-shot model via a second-order surrogate, eliminating the need for large-scale data replay. Experiments show that MERGETUNE improves the harmonic mean of CoOp by +5.6% on base-novel generalisation without adding parameters. On robust fine-tuning evaluations, the LMC-merged model from MERGETUNE surpasses ensemble baselines with lower inference cost, achieving further gains and state-of-the-art results when ensembled with the zero-shot model. Our code is available at https://github.com/Surrey-UP-Lab/MERGETUNE.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 34 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.

Builds on

34 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023TCP:Textual-based Class-aware Prompt tuning for Visual-Language Model30 Nov
  2. 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimization23 Mar
  3. 2022Unified Vision and Language Prompt Learning13 Oct
  4. 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classification19 Jul
  5. 2022Prompt Distribution Learning6 May
  6. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
  7. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct
  8. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 26

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  4. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  5. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  6. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  7. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  8. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  9. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  10. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  11. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
  12. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
14 more
  1. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  2. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
  3. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  4. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
  5. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  6. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
  7. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
  8. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
  9. 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 330
  10. 2020Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learningcited by 145
  11. 2024EMR-Merging: Tuning-Free High-Performance Model Mergingcited by 110
  12. 2024Advancing Textual Prompt Learning with Anchored Attributescited by 20
  13. 2024Efficient and Versatile Robust Fine-Tuning of Zero-shot Modelscited by 7
  14. 2024Robust Fine-tuning of Zero-shot Models via Variance Reductioncited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Continual Learning in Vision-Language Models via Aligned Model Merging
  2. 2025Rethinking Fine-Tuning: Unlocking Hidden Capabilities in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Synthetic Data is an Elegant GIFT for Continual Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Infusing fine-grained visual knowledge to Vision-Language Models
  5. 2024Skip Tuning: Pre-trained Vision-Language Models are Effective and Efficient Adapters Themselves
  6. 2024SMoLoRA: Exploring and Defying Dual Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Visual Instruction Tuning
  7. 2025Enhanced Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models with Model Fusion
  8. 2026Understanding Cross-Modal Contributions in Continual Vision-Language Models: A Theoretical Perspective