CROCS: A Two-Stage Clustering Framework for Behaviour-Centric Consumer Segmentation with Smart Meter Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With grid operators confronting rising uncertainty from renewable integration and a broader push toward electrification, Demand-Side Management (DSM) -- particularly Demand Response (DR) -- has attracted significant attention as a cost-effective mechanism for balancing modern electricity systems. Unprecedented volumes of consumption data from a continuing global deployment of smart meters enable consumer segmentation based on real usage behaviours, promising to inform the design of more effective DSM and DR programs. However, existing clustering-based segmentation methods insufficiently reflect the behavioural diversity of consumers, often relying on rigid temporal alignment, and faltering in the presence of anomalies, missing data, or large-scale deployments. To address these challenges, we propose a novel two-stage clustering framework -- Clustered Representations Optimising Consumer Segmentation (CROCS). In the first stage, each consumer's daily load profiles are clustered independently to form a Representative Load Set (RLS), providing a compact summary of their typical diurnal consumption behaviours. In the second stage, consumers are clustered using the Weighted Sum of Minimum Distances (WSMD), a novel set-to-set measure that compares RLSs by accounting for both the prevalence and similarity of those behaviours. Finally, community detection on the WSMD-induced graph reveals higher-order prototypes that embody the shared diurnal behaviours defining consumer groups, enhancing the interpretability of the resulting clusters. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real Australian smart meter datasets demonstrate that CROCS captures intra-consumer variability, uncovers both synchronous and asynchronous behavioural similarities, and remains robust to anomalies and missing data, while scaling efficiently through natural parallelisation. These results...
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.
Builds on
14 of 120 references.
References · 14
- 2018From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communitiescited by 381
- 2016Community detection in networks: A user guidecited by 105
- 2018Review of Smart Meter Data Analytics: Applications, Methodologies, and Challengescited by 47
- 2020A Benchmark Study on Time Series Clusteringcited by 25
- 2022Are Cluster Validity Measures (In)valid?cited by 16
- 2022A Review and Evaluation of Elastic Distance Functions for Time Series Clusteringcited by 14
- 2017Shape-Based Approach to Household Load Curve Clustering and Predictioncited by 7
- 2023A Machine Learning-Based Framework for Clustering Residential Electricity Load Profiles to Enhance Demand Response Programscited by 5
- 2019Hierarchical Clustering for Smart Meter Electricity Loads based on Quantile Autocovariancescited by 4
- 2014Variability of Behaviour in Electricity Load Profile Clustering; Who Does Things at the Same Time Each Day?cited by 2
- 2021Dynamic Time Warping Clustering to Discover Socio-Economic Characteristics in Smart Water Meter Datacited by 2
- 2024On the Use of Relative Validity Indices for Comparing Clustering Approachescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.