mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bounded Hyperbolic Tangent: A Stable and Efficient Alternative to Pre-Layer Normalization in Large Language Models

arXiv 2601.09719 ↗First posted 26 Dec 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-Layer Normalization (Pre-LN) is the de facto choice for large language models (LLMs) and is crucial for stable pretraining and effective transfer learning. However, Pre-LN incurs repeated statistical-computation overhead and remains vulnerable to the curse of depth, where hidden-state magnitudes and variances grow as the number of layers increases, destabilizing training. Efficiency-oriented normalization-free methods such as Dynamic Tanh (DyT) improve throughput but remain fragile at depth. To jointly address stability and efficiency, we propose Bounded Hyperbolic Tanh (BHyT), a drop-in replacement for Pre-LN. BHyT combines a tanh nonlinearity with explicit, data-driven input bounding to keep activations within a non-saturating range. It prevents depth-wise growth in activation magnitude and variance and provides a theoretical stability guarantee. For efficiency, BHyT computes exact statistics once per block and replaces a second normalization with a lightweight variance approximation. Empirically, BHyT demonstrates improved stability and efficiency during pretraining, achieving an average of 1.6% faster training and an average of 1.77% higher token generation throughput compared to RMSNorm, while maintaining strong pretraining-only and post-SFT performance across language understanding and reasoning benchmarksfootnoteCode is available at: https://github.com/MLAI-Yonsei/BHyT.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2025.

Builds on

26 of 31 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  5. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  8. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  9. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  10. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  11. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  12. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
14 more
  1. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  2. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,598
  3. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  4. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  5. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  6. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  7. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
  8. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  9. 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 922
  10. 2025Transformers without Normalizationcited by 70
  11. 2025The Curse of Depth in Large Language Modelscited by 62
  12. 2025Peri-LN: Revisiting Normalization Layer in the Transformer Architecturecited by 34
  13. 2025Stronger Normalization-Free Transformerscited by 13
  14. 2025SeeDNorm: Self-Rescaled Dynamic Normalizationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.