Attentive multilayer fusion for vision transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the rise of large-scale foundation models, efficiently adapting them to downstream tasks remains a central challenge. Linear probing, which freezes the backbone and trains a lightweight head, is computationally efficient but often restricted to last-layer representations. We show that task-relevant information is distributed across the network hierarchy rather than encoded solely in the last layers. To leverage this distribution of information, we apply an attentive probing mechanism that dynamically fuses representations from all layers of a Vision Transformer. This attentive layer fusion (ALF) learns to identify the most relevant layers for a target task and combines low-level structural cues with high-level semantic abstractions. Across 20 diverse datasets and multiple pretrained foundation models, ALF achieves consistent, substantial gains over standard linear probes. Attention heatmaps further reveal that tasks different from the pre-training domain benefit most from intermediate representations. Overall, our findings underscore the value of intermediate layers and demonstrate a principled, task-aware approach for unlocking their potential for probing-based adaptation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2026.
Builds on
42 of 70 references.
References · 42
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
30 more
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
- 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
- 2021CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image Classificationcited by 806
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
- 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
- 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
- 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
- 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 420
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
- 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
- 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 315
- 2022Context Autoencoder for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 297
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
- 2024Scalable Pre-training of Large Autoregressive Image Modelscited by 115
- 2022Head2Toe: Utilizing Intermediate Representations for Better Transfer Learningcited by 83
- 2022What do Vision Transformers Learn? A Visual Explorationcited by 75
- 2022Human alignment of neural network representationscited by 74
- 2020Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?cited by 73
- 2022Visual Query Tuning: Towards Effective Usage of Intermediate Representations for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 57
- 2025From Colors to Classes: Emergence of Concepts in Vision Transformerscited by 23
- 2024Objective drives the consistency of representational similarity across datasetscited by 16
- 2025Attention, Please! Revisiting Attentive Probing Through the Lens of Efficiencycited by 11
- 2025Mysteries of the Deep: Role of Intermediate Representations in Out of Distribution Detectioncited by 6
- 2022Neural Networks as Paths through the Space of Representationscited by 5
- 2025VAT: Vision Action Transformer by Unlocking Full Representation of ViTcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026S-squared-VLA: Decoupling Semantic and Spatial Streams in Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 0
- 2026Distill What RGB Can Recover: Privileged 3D Evidence for RGB-Only Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026What Makes a Good Layer? Assessing the Layer-Wise Intrinsic Properties of Music Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026FuseReg: Regularizing Layer Fusion Mitigates the Reconstruction-Generation Gap in Representation Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026FuseReg: Regularizing Layer Fusion Mitigates the Reconstruction-Generation Gap in Representation Autoencoders25 Sep 2026
- 2026What Makes a Good Layer? Assessing the Layer-Wise Intrinsic Properties of Music Foundation Models14 Aug 2026
- 2026Distill What RGB Can Recover: Privileged 3D Evidence for RGB-Only Vision-Language Models31 Jul 2026
- 2026S-squared-VLA: Decoupling Semantic and Spatial Streams in Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving15 Jul 2026