Fairness risk and its privacy-enabled solution in AI-driven robotic applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Complex decision-making by autonomous machines and algorithms could underpin the foundations of future society. Generative AI is emerging as a powerful engine for such transitions. However, we show that Generative AI-driven developments pose a critical pitfall: fairness concerns. In robotic applications, although intuitions about fairness are common, a precise and implementable definition that captures user utility and inherent data randomness is missing. Here we provide a utility-aware fairness metric for robotic decision making and analyze fairness jointly with user-data privacy, deriving conditions under which privacy budgets govern fairness metrics. This yields a unified framework that formalizes and quantifies fairness and its interplay with privacy, which is tested in a robot navigation task. In view of the fact that under legal requirements, most robotic systems will enforce user privacy, the approach shows surprisingly that such privacy budgets can be jointly used to meet fairness targets. Addressing fairness concerns in the creative combined consideration of privacy is a step towards ethical use of AI and strengthens trust in autonomous robots deployed in everyday environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 56 references.
References · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 648
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2023ConceptGraphs: Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Graphs for Perception and Planningcited by 365
12 more
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2023LL3DA: Visual Interactive Instruction Tuning for Omni-3D Understanding, Reasoning, and Planningcited by 210
- 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 85
- 2019PC-Fairness: A Unified Framework for Measuring Causality-based Fairnesscited by 67
- 2020FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 52
- 2018Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 51
- 2020Fair Learning with Private Demographic Datacited by 46
- 2020Algorithmic Fairness in Educationcited by 44
- 2021Measuring Fairness in Generative Modelscited by 31
- 2022Deep Fair Clustering via Maximizing and Minimizing Mutual Information: Theory, Algorithm and Metriccited by 17
- 2020Improving Fairness and Privacy in Selection Problemscited by 16
- 2024Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Artcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.