AI Deployment Authorisation: A Global Standard for Machine-Readable Governance of High-Risk Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern artificial intelligence governance lacks a formal, enforceable mechanism for determining whether a given AI system is legally permitted to operate in a specific domain and jurisdiction. Existing tools such as model cards, audits, and benchmark evaluations provide descriptive information about model behavior and training data but do not produce binding deployment decisions with legal or financial force. This paper introduces the AI Deployment Authorisation Score (ADAS), a machine-readable regulatory framework that evaluates AI systems across five legally and economically grounded dimensions: risk, alignment, externality, control, and auditability. ADAS produces a cryptographically verifiable deployment certificate that regulators, insurers, and infrastructure operators can consume as a license to operate, using public-key verification and transparency mechanisms adapted from secure software supply chain and certificate transparency systems. The paper presents the formal specification, decision logic, evidence model, and policy architecture of ADAS and demonstrates how it operationalizes the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, United States critical infrastructure governance, and insurance underwriting requirements by compiling statutory and regulatory obligations into machine-executable deployment gates. We argue that deployment-level authorization, rather than model-level evaluation, constitutes the missing institutional layer required for safe, lawful, and economically scalable artificial intelligence.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.
Builds on
4 of 25 references.
References · 4
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 249
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.