mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated Lesion Segmentation of Stroke MRI Using nnU-Net: A Comprehensive External Validation Across Acute and Chronic Lesions

arXiv 2601.08701 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2026q-bio.QM cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate and generalisable segmentation of stroke lesions from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for advancing clinical research, prognostic modelling, and personalised interventions. Although deep learning has improved automated lesion delineation, many existing models are optimised for narrow imaging contexts and generalise poorly to independent datasets, modalities, and stroke stages. Here, we systematically evaluated stroke lesion segmentation using the nnU-Net framework across multiple heterogeneous, publicly available MRI datasets spanning acute and chronic stroke. Models were trained and tested on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and T1-weighted MRI, and evaluated on independent datasets. Across stroke stages, models showed robust generalisation, with segmentation accuracy approaching reported inter-rater reliability. Performance varied with imaging modality and training data characteristics. In acute stroke, DWI-trained models consistently outperformed FLAIR-based models, with only modest gains from multimodal combinations. In chronic stroke, increasing training set size improved performance, with diminishing returns beyond several hundred cases. Lesion volume was a key determinant of accuracy: smaller lesions were harder to segment, and models trained on restricted volume ranges generalised poorly. MRI image quality further constrained generalisability: models trained on lower-quality scans transferred poorly, whereas those trained on higher-quality data generalised well to noisier images. Discrepancies between predictions and reference masks were often attributable to limitations in manual annotations. Together, these findings show that automated lesion segmentation can approach human-level performance while identifying key factors governing generalisability and informing the development of lesion segmentation tools.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.

Builds on

8 of 60 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
  3. 2022ISLES 2022: A multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion segmentation datasetcited by 106
  4. 2018Prediction of final infarct volume from native CT perfusion and treatment parameters using deep learningcited by 12
  5. 2024Transformers-based architectures for stroke segmentation: A reviewcited by 5
  6. 2024Synthetic Data for Robust Stroke Segmentationcited by 4
  7. 2024TESL-Net: A Transformer-Enhanced CNN for Accurate Skin Lesion Segmentationcited by 4
  8. 2024Deep models for stroke segmentation: do complex architectures always perform better?cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.