mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Emergent Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems via Pressure Fields and Temporal Decay

arXiv 2601.08129 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2026cs.MAcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Current multi-agent LLM frameworks rely on explicit orchestration patterns borrowed from human organizational structures: planners delegate to executors, managers coordinate workers, and hierarchical control flow governs agent interactions. These approaches suffer from coordination overhead that scales poorly with agent count and task complexity. We propose a fundamentally different paradigm inspired by natural coordination mechanisms: agents operate locally on a shared artifact, guided only by pressure gradients derived from measurable quality signals, with temporal decay preventing premature convergence. We formalize this as optimization over a pressure landscape and prove convergence guarantees under mild conditions. Empirically, on meeting room scheduling across 1,350 trials, pressure-field coordination outperforms all baselines: 48.5% aggregate solve rate versus 12.6% for conversation-based coordination, 1.5% for hierarchical control, and 0.4% for sequential and random baselines (all pairwise comparisons p < 0.001). Temporal decay is essential: disabling it reduces solve rate by 10 percentage points. On easy problems, pressure-field achieves 86.7% solve rate. The approach maintains consistent performance from 1 to 4 agents. Implicit coordination through shared pressure gradients outperforms explicit hierarchical control, suggesting that constraint-driven emergence offers a simpler and more effective foundation for multi-agent AI.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.

Builds on

4 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework1 Aug
  2. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society31 Mar

Other references · 2

  1. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  2. 2013On the Convergence of Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 159

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Silo-Bench: A Scalable Environment for Evaluating Distributed Coordination in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  2. 2026SyncPlan: Long-Horizon LLM Coordination with Explicit Synchronization and Adaptive Correction
  3. 2026Scaling Behavior of Single LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems
  4. 2025Emergent Coordination in Multi-Agent Language Models
  5. 2026DPBench: Structural Determinants of Multi-Agent LLM Coordination Under Simultaneous Resource Contention
  6. 2025Orchestrator: Active Inference for Multi-Agent Systems in Long-Horizon Tasks
  7. 2025Self-Resource Allocation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  8. 2026Multi-Agent Coordination Adaptation via Structure-Guided Orchestration