mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explaining Machine Learning Predictive Models through Conditional Expectation Methods

arXiv 2601.07313 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid adoption of complex Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) models has led to their characterization as black boxes due to the difficulty of explaining their internal decision-making processes. This lack of transparency hinders users' ability to understand, validate and trust model behavior, particularly in high-risk applications. Although explainable AI (XAI) has made significant progress, there remains a need for versatile and effective techniques to address increasingly complex models. This work introduces Multivariate Conditional Expectation (MUCE), a model-agnostic method for local explainability designed to capture prediction changes from feature interactions. MUCE extends Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) by exploring a multivariate grid of values in the neighborhood of a given observation at inference time, providing graphical explanations that illustrate the local evolution of model predictions. In addition, two quantitative indices, stability and uncertainty, summarize local behavior and assess model reliability. Uncertainty is further decomposed into uncertainty+ and uncertainty- to capture asymmetric effects that global measures may overlook. The proposed method is validated using XGBoost models trained on three datasets: two synthetic (2D and 3D) to evaluate behavior near decision boundaries, and one transformed real-world dataset to test adaptability to heterogeneous feature types. Results show that MUCE effectively captures complex local model behavior, while the stability and uncertainty indices provide meaningful insight into prediction confidence. MUCE, together with the ICE modification and the proposed indices, offers a practical contribution to local explainability, enabling both graphical and quantitative insights that enhance the interpretability of predictive models and support more trustworthy and transparent decision-making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.

Builds on

9 of 29 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  5. 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 217
  6. 2017Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Modelscited by 206
  7. 2017Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 162
  8. 2015Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction modelcited by 140
  9. 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125

Built on by

Not cited yet.