Lexicalized Constituency Parsing for Middle Dutch: Low-resource Training and Cross-Domain Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent years have seen growing interest in applying neural networks and contextualized word embeddings to the parsing of historical languages. However, most advances have focused on dependency parsing, while constituency parsing for low-resource historical languages like Middle Dutch has received little attention. In this paper, we adapt a transformer-based constituency parser to Middle Dutch, a highly heterogeneous and low-resource language, and investigate methods to improve both its in-domain and cross-domain performance. We show that joint training with higher-resource auxiliary languages increases F1 scores by up to 0.73, with the greatest gains achieved from languages that are geographically and temporally closer to Middle Dutch. We further evaluate strategies for leveraging newly annotated data from additional domains, finding that fine-tuning and data combination yield comparable improvements, and our neural parser consistently outperforms the currently used PCFG-based parser for Middle Dutch. We further explore feature-separation techniques for domain adaptation and demonstrate that a minimum threshold of approximately 200 examples per domain is needed to effectively enhance cross-domain performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 77 references.
References · 24
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,614
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,909
- 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,556
- 2016Domain Separation Networkscited by 318
- 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 197
- 2020Neural Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in NLP---A Surveycited by 144
- 2018Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Trainingcited by 117
- 2020Low-Resource Domain Adaptation for Compositional Task-Oriented Semantic Parsingcited by 72
- 2019Learning What and Where to Transfercited by 43
- 2019Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Parsing on Penn Treebankcited by 43
- 2018Extending a Parser to Distant Domains Using a Few Dozen Partially Annotated Examplescited by 34
12 more
- 2018Neural Segmental Hypergraphs for Overlapping Mention Recognitioncited by 32
- 2019Deep Contextualized Self-training for Low Resource Dependency Parsingcited by 24
- 2020Nested Named Entity Recognition with Partially-Observed TreeCRFscited by 23
- 2018What's Going On in Neural Constituency Parsers? An Analysiscited by 22
- 2021Bottom-Up Constituency Parsing and Nested Named Entity Recognition with Pointer Networkscited by 21
- 2016Span-Based Constituency Parsing with a Structure-Label System and Provably Optimal Dynamic Oraclescited by 20
- 2019Cross-Domain Generalization of Neural Constituency Parserscited by 17
- 2019How to best use Syntax in Semantic Role Labellingcited by 11
- 2020Encoding Syntactic Constituency Paths for Frame-Semantic Parsing with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 7
- 2019Robust Semantic Parsing with Adversarial Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 6
- 2021Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English: First Parsing Results and Analysiscited by 2
- 2023Cross-Lingual Constituency Parsing for Middle High German: A Delexicalized Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.