mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

textttAMEND++: Benchmarking Eligibility Criteria Amendments in Clinical Trials

arXiv 2601.06300 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical trial amendments frequently introduce delays, increased costs, and administrative burden, with eligibility criteria being the most commonly amended component. We introduce textiteligibility criteria amendment prediction, a novel NLP task that aims to forecast whether the eligibility criteria of an initial trial protocol will undergo future amendments. To support this task, we release textttAMEND++, a benchmark suite comprising two datasets: textttAMEND, which captures eligibility-criteria version histories and amendment labels from public clinical trials, and verb|AMENDLLM|, a refined subset curated using an LLM-based denoising pipeline to isolate substantive changes. We further propose textitChange-Aware Masked Language Modeling (CAMLM), a revision-aware pretraining strategy that leverages historical edits to learn amendment-sensitive representations. Experiments across diverse baselines show that CAMLM consistently improves amendment prediction, enabling more robust and cost-effective clinical trial design.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2026.

Builds on

4 of 17 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021HINT: Hierarchical Interaction Network for Trial Outcome Prediction Leveraging Web Datacited by 49
  2. 2024Automatically Labeling Clinical Trial Outcomes: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Drug Developmentcited by 7
  3. 2020Information Extraction of Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteriacited by 6
  4. 2025SECRET: Semi-supervised Clinical Trial Document Similarity Searchcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.